Skip to main content

Security report for janex-buve.lv

Janex-buve · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

37/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Janex-buve is a Latvian small business specializing in construction, repair, transport, and household master services. With over 11 years of experience and nearly a thousand satisfied clients, it serves local customers primarily in Sigulda and Riga. The website is built on WordPress using popular plugins for sliders and forms, hosted by Starflix hosting. The technical infrastructure is moderate with good mobile optimization but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but missing important security headers and no visible security policies. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating low privacy compliance. WHOIS data could not be retrieved, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching janex-buve.lv

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
37

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention janex-buve.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for janex-buve.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Janex-buve operates as a local service provider in Latvia offering passenger and cargo transport, construction and repair works, household master services, and excavator-loader services. The business model focuses on direct service delivery to local residents and businesses. The company leverages WordPress for its digital presence but lacks advanced marketing and analytics tools. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests limited focus on regulatory compliance. The company maintains social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, and Pinterest, enhancing customer engagement. The hosting provider is Starflix, indicating a local hosting choice. The business appears stable with a moderate market position but could improve trust signals by publishing certifications and security policies.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies is found. The use of popular WordPress plugins requires regular updates to avoid known vulnerabilities. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, reducing privacy risks but also limiting business intelligence. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Overall, the security posture is basic and requires improvements to meet modern standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and all plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to improve transparency and security readiness.
  5. Enhance SEO and accessibility features to improve website reach and usability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Janex-buve
Description
Janex-buve is a company primarily engaged in construction and repair works, including small repairs and household master services. They offer passenger and cargo transport, construction and repair services, home master services, and excavator-loader services. The business targets local customers in Latvia, especially in Sigulda and Riga areas.
Key services
Passenger transport, Cargo transport, Construction and repair works, Household master services, Excavator-loader services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Fonts, LayerSlider plugin, Revolution Slider plugin, Contact Form 7 plugin, Visual Composer
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Latvian language targeting local Latvian customers.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on homepage or linked pages.
  4. Contact information is present but limited to email and phone in footer and contact page links.
  5. Website uses WordPress with common plugins for sliders and forms.
  6. No advanced security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond standard WordPress plugins.
  8. No explicit business certifications or security policies published.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no domain age or registrant info extracted.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with plugins such as LayerSlider, Revolution Slider, Contact Form 7, and Visual Composer. It uses jQuery and Google Fonts for frontend functionality and styling. Hosting is provided by Starflix, a local hosting provider. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design but lacks advanced accessibility features. Performance is moderate with no evident caching or CDN usage. SEO is basic with meta viewport and canonical tags but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data found. No analytics or tracking tools are integrated. The technical stack is standard for small business websites but could be modernized for better performance and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with janex-buve.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review janex-buve.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.