Skip to main content

Security report for jakubcigler.archi

Jakub Cigler Architekti, a.s. · Real Estate · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jakub Cigler Architekti, a.s. is a well-established Czech architectural firm founded in 2001, specializing in progressive and sustainable architecture. The company holds a strong market position in the Czech Republic with multiple awards and is a founding member of the Czech Green Building Council. Their website reflects a professional portfolio showcasing projects and news relevant to their industry. Technically, the site is built on Drupal 7 with legacy jQuery libraries and uses modern UI components like Slick Carousel and FitVids for media responsiveness. Security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing security headers and updating legacy libraries. Privacy compliance is minimal with no visible privacy or cookie policies. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, supporting the company's credibility in the real estate and architectural sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jakubcigler.archi

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention jakubcigler.archi, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
1
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for jakubcigler.archi.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets real estate developers, public sector clients, and stakeholders interested in architectural design and urban planning. Their business model focuses on architectural consultancy and design services with an emphasis on sustainability. The firm has a medium-sized footprint and a consistent brand presence. Their project portfolio and awards indicate competitive advantages in the Czech market. The website's lack of advanced analytics or tracking suggests a privacy-conscious approach or limited digital marketing focus. Partnerships include the Czech Green Building Council and web development by Onkubator. Growth indicators include recent project completions and active news updates.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. The use of Drupal 7 and jQuery 1.10 indicates potential exposure to known vulnerabilities if not properly patched. No forms or user input fields are present on the homepage, reducing attack surface. No incident response or security policy information is provided, which could be improved for transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to align with best practices and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Upgrade Drupal CMS and jQuery library to supported, secure versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Introduce a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance website accessibility and SEO by adding ARIA roles and meta tags.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Jakub Cigler Architekti, a.s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jakub Cigler Architekti, a.s.
Description
Jakub Cigler Architekti (JCA) is an architectural studio founded in November 2001, recognized as a leading Czech atelier specializing in progressive architecture. The company has won multiple architectural awards domestically and internationally and is a founding member of the Czech Green Building Council.
Key services
Architectural design, Urban planning, Sustainable building consultancy
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.10, Drupal 7, FitVids.js, Slick Carousel, Less CSS
Frameworks
Drupal 7
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Czech language with option for English.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on homepage.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided in footer with company email and phone.
  5. Website uses Drupal 7 CMS with older jQuery version but no obvious vulnerabilities detected.
  6. Social media presence includes Facebook and YouTube links.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML.
  8. No forms detected on homepage; no user data collection observed.
  9. WHOIS data is limited due to TLD and privacy restrictions; no red flags found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 7 CMS, which is an older platform but still functional. It uses jQuery 1.10, FitVids.js for responsive video embeds, and Slick Carousel for slideshows. CSS is managed with Less preprocessor files. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements and uses SVG logos for scalability. Performance is moderate, with multiple CSS imports and JavaScript files loaded. No advanced analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal data collection. The site lacks modern security headers and could benefit from CMS and library upgrades to reduce technical debt and security risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 50/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jakubcigler.archi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jakubcigler.archi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.