Skip to main content

Security report for jaguar.ph

Jaguar Philippines · Transportation · Philippines

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jaguar Philippines operates as the official regional website for the Jaguar automotive brand in the Philippines, representing a premium vehicle manufacturer with a long-standing history since 1935. The website serves as a digital showroom and brand information portal, targeting general consumers interested in luxury vehicles. The site leverages modern web technologies including Nuxt.js and CDN-hosted assets to deliver a responsive and visually consistent user experience. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit privacy and cookie policies are absent, which may impact compliance. Business credibility is high given the brand's global reputation and consistent domain registration data. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could improve transparency around privacy and contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jaguar.ph

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions Jaguar as a premium automotive brand in the Philippine market, focusing on vehicle sales and brand engagement. The business model is retail and marketing of luxury vehicles, supported by a global parent company, Jaguar Land Rover. The site is part of a broad international network of Jaguar regional sites, indicating a well-established partnership ecosystem. The target audience includes affluent consumers and automotive enthusiasts. The site lacks direct e-commerce but supports lead generation and customer engagement. Growth indicators include extensive localization and multi-language support links. Strategic observations suggest maintaining brand consistency and expanding digital customer support could enhance market penetration.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data in the HTML. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are provided, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, potentially exposing the business to regulatory risks. Overall, the site is secure but could benefit from enhanced security headers and compliance documentation to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and prominently link a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and incident response.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO metadata to improve user experience and search engine visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jaguar Philippines
Description
Since 1935, Jaguar has been at its best when looking forward. With fearless creativity at our core, we continue to challenge convention.
Key services
Automobile sales, Brand information, Vehicle configuration, Customer support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vue.js (implied by Nuxt.js usage), Nuxt.js, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google site verification present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a regional official brand site for Jaguar in the Philippines.
  2. Content is professionally presented with consistent branding.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML snippet provided.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  6. Uses modern web technologies and CDN for media and fonts.
  7. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected in the provided content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Nuxt.js, a modern Vue.js framework, and utilizes CDN-hosted fonts and media assets for performance optimization. The HTML structure is well-formed with appropriate meta tags for SEO and social media sharing (Open Graph and Twitter cards). The site is mobile-optimized and uses responsive design principles. However, no explicit CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Performance is moderate, with preloading of fonts and scripts indicating optimization efforts. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts in the provided content suggests minimal user tracking. Technical risks are low but could be mitigated further by adding security headers and improving privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jaguar.ph. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jaguar.ph.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.