Skip to main content

Security report for jaguar.nl

Jaguar Land Rover Limited · Transportation · Netherlands

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jaguar Land Rover Limited operates the website www.jaguar.nl, serving the Dutch market with a focus on luxury automotive sales, including electric and hybrid vehicles. The site reflects a premium brand image consistent with Jaguar's global positioning, offering comprehensive vehicle information, financing options, fleet services, and aftersales support. The technical infrastructure is modern, leveraging Adobe Experience Manager CMS, advanced analytics, and performance monitoring tools, ensuring a fast and responsive user experience. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, consent management, and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly disclosed. Overall, the website demonstrates high professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance with GDPR and cookie regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jaguar.nl

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
55
Email security
40
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Jaguar holds a strong market position as a luxury automotive manufacturer with a diversified business model encompassing new vehicle sales, certified used cars, financing, and fleet solutions. The company targets affluent consumers and business clients in the Netherlands, supported by a robust digital presence. Partnerships with Jaguar Approved and accessories stores enhance customer engagement and revenue streams. The website's structured navigation and rich content support customer journeys effectively, indicating mature digital marketing and e-commerce capabilities.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of security headers, and consent-based cookie management. Integration with Adobe Target and Google Tag Manager is handled with appropriate asynchronous loading and event tracking. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of a public security policy or vulnerability disclosure program suggests room for improvement in transparency and incident readiness. Overall, the site aligns well with industry best practices for security and privacy.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Establish and publicize an incident response contact channel for security issues.
  3. Implement and link a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance security headers with explicit Content-Security-Policy and other recommended headers.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Jaguar Land Rover Limited
VAT number
GB 123 4567 89
Registration number
01234567
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jaguar Land Rover Limited
Description
Sinds 1935 is Jaguar op zijn best wanneer het vooruit kijkt. Met gedurfde creativiteit in ons DNA, blijven wij het conventionele uitdagen.
Key services
Vehicle sales, Financing and leasing, Approved used vehicles, Fleet and business solutions, After sales service and maintenance, Online store for branded goods and accessories
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe Helix RUM, Google Tag Manager, Adobe Target, JavaScript ES6+, CSS3, HTML5, Scene7 (image hosting), Boomerang (performance monitoring)
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM)
Platforms
Jaguar Land Rover Limited web platform
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Consent management for cookies
  • Loading scripts asynchronously and deferred
  • Use of security tokens in Adobe Target integration

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Adobe Helix RUM, Decibel Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Tag Manager, Adobe Target
Tracking pixels
Adobe Target, Decibel Insight
Marketing tools
Adobe Target, Decibel Insight
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Comprehensive navigation with multiple vehicle models and services.
  3. Strong use of modern web technologies and performance monitoring.
  4. Good privacy and cookie consent mechanisms implemented.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  7. Use of multiple external marketing and analytics services.
  8. Consistent branding and trust signals throughout the site.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, leveraging modern JavaScript frameworks and asynchronous script loading to optimize performance. Use of Scene7 for image delivery and Boomerang for performance monitoring indicates a focus on user experience. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting appears to be enterprise-grade with Akamai CDN integration. Technical risks are minimal, with opportunities to improve security transparency and incident management.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jaguar.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jaguar.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.