Skip to main content

Security report for jaguar.lv

Jaguar Latvija · Transportation · Latvia

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jaguar Latvija is the official regional website representing the Jaguar automotive brand in Latvia. The site provides vehicle information, brand services, and customer support tailored to Latvian consumers. It serves as a digital presence for Jaguar under the parent company Jaguar Land Rover, targeting the Latvian market with localized content and multiple language options. The website demonstrates a moderate level of digital maturity, leveraging modern JavaScript frameworks such as Nuxt.js and integrating Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics for analytics and consent management. The design is professional and mobile-optimized, offering a good user experience with clear navigation and branding consistency. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and use of consent management, but lacks explicit security headers and visible privacy or cookie policies in the provided content. No contact information or incident response details are found, indicating areas for improvement in transparency and compliance. Overall, the website is trustworthy and aligns well with the brand's global presence, but could enhance privacy compliance and security best practices to strengthen user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jaguar.lv

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Jaguar Latvija operates as an essential entity within the transportation sector, representing the Jaguar brand in Latvia. The business model focuses on brand representation and vehicle sales, targeting affluent consumers interested in luxury vehicles. The website acts as a key touchpoint for marketing and customer engagement, linking extensively to Jaguar's global and regional domains, indicating a strong partnership ecosystem. The site lacks direct e-commerce functionality but supports lead generation and brand awareness. The absence of explicit contact details and privacy policies suggests a reliance on offline or separate channels for customer interaction and compliance. The company benefits from the reputation of its parent company Jaguar Land Rover, positioning it well in the Latvian automotive market. Growth indicators include multilingual support and integration of modern marketing tools, though further transparency and digital maturity enhancements could improve competitive advantage.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration, ensuring encrypted communications. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics for analytics and consent management, reflecting awareness of privacy and tracking controls. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No visible privacy policy, cookie policy, or incident response contacts are present, indicating gaps in compliance and user transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The security score is moderate, with recommendations to implement security headers, publish clear privacy and cookie policies, and provide incident response contacts to enhance security posture and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy prominently on the website.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security incident reporting.
  4. Provide a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jaguar Latvija
Description
Official Latvian website for Jaguar, providing information about Jaguar vehicles, services, and brand presence in Latvia.
Key services
Vehicle information, Brand services, Customer support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Usercentrics (consent management), Nuxt.js (implied by _nuxt paths), Google Fonts
Frameworks
Vue.js / Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with async loading
  • Use of consent management platform (Usercentrics)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Usercentrics
Marketing tools
Usercentrics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official regional Jaguar brand website for Latvia
  2. Content is in Latvian language with multiple language alternates
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found in the provided HTML snippet
  4. Use of modern web technologies and consent management platform
  5. No visible contact emails or phone numbers in the provided content
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  7. No security headers explicitly detected in HTML content
  8. Strong branding consistency and professional design
  9. No adult or questionable content detected
  10. Extensive external links to Jaguar global and regional domains
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies, likely Nuxt.js (Vue.js framework), with asynchronous loading of Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics scripts for analytics and consent management. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts, and images and assets are served via Jaguar Land Rover's CDN domains, indicating a robust content delivery infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO enhancement. Performance is moderate, with preloading of fonts and scripts to improve load times. However, the lack of explicit security headers and absence of visible privacy and cookie policies suggest technical debt in compliance and security best practices. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence but requires improvements in security and privacy implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jaguar.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jaguar.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.