Skip to main content

Security report for jaguar-jordan.com

Jaguar Jordan · Transportation · Jordan

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jaguar Jordan represents the Jaguar automotive brand in Jordan, providing vehicle information and services aligned with the global Jaguar brand. The website is built using modern web technologies such as Nuxt.js, ensuring a responsive and user-friendly experience. However, the absence of WHOIS data and lack of visible privacy and cookie policies indicate gaps in transparency and compliance. Security posture is moderate with no evident security headers or incident response information. Overall, the site serves its business purpose effectively but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy measures to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jaguar-jordan.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
45
Email security
40
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions Jaguar Jordan as a regional representative of the Jaguar brand, targeting automotive customers in Jordan. The business model focuses on retail and brand engagement, leveraging the global Jaguar network. The site links to numerous regional Jaguar domains, indicating a broad partnership ecosystem. However, the lack of explicit contact information and privacy policies may limit customer trust and regulatory compliance. Growth opportunities include improving digital transparency and security to align with global standards.

Security posture

The current security posture is basic, with HTTPS implied but no explicit security headers detected in the HTML content. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure, incident response contacts, or security certifications. The absence of privacy and cookie policies further weakens compliance with GDPR and related regulations. The site should implement standard security headers, publish privacy and cookie policies, and provide clear security contact channels to enhance its security maturity and regulatory adherence.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Ensure WHOIS data is available or provide transparency about domain registration to improve trust.
  4. Include contact information for security incidents and designate a Data Protection Officer if applicable.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jaguar Jordan
Description
Since 1935, Jaguar has been at its best when looking forward. With fearless creativity at our core, we continue to challenge convention.
Key services
automobile sales, brand information, vehicle configuration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vue.js (Nuxt.js)
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating possible privacy protection or unregistered domain.
  3. Website uses modern JavaScript framework Nuxt.js for frontend.
  4. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in provided content.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  6. Strong branding consistent with Jaguar Land Rover corporate identity.
  7. Multiple alternate language and regional URLs linked, indicating a global brand presence.
  8. No security headers or explicit security policies detected in the HTML content.
  9. No analytics or advertising scripts detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Nuxt.js, a modern Vue.js framework, indicating a contemporary technical infrastructure. The site is optimized for mobile and desktop with good SEO practices evident from meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate, with multiple preloaded fonts and images hosted on Jaguar Land Rover's CDN. However, the lack of visible security headers and privacy compliance features suggests technical debt in security and regulatory areas. Hosting provider details are not disclosed, and no CMS is detected, implying a custom or proprietary platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jaguar-jordan.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jaguar-jordan.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.