Skip to main content

Security report for jaguar-iraq.com

Jaguar Iraq · Transportation · Iraq

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jaguar Iraq is a localized website representing the Jaguar automotive brand in Iraq, providing brand information and vehicle sales services. The site leverages a modern technical stack including Nuxt.js and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity. The website is professionally designed with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. However, the absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about the legitimacy of the domain registration, which impacts overall trust. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced but lacks comprehensive security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies. Contact information is not readily available, which may hinder user trust and compliance. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and transparency of business contact details are recommended to enhance credibility and security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jaguar-iraq.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
45
Email security
40
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions Jaguar Iraq as a regional representative of the Jaguar brand, targeting automotive customers in Iraq. The business model focuses on brand promotion and vehicle sales, leveraging the global Jaguar brand equity. The site integrates with multiple advertising and tracking platforms, indicating an active marketing strategy. However, the lack of visible contact details and privacy policies suggests room for improvement in customer engagement and regulatory compliance. The domain registration inconsistency is a notable risk factor that should be addressed to avoid reputational damage.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a presumably good SSL configuration, ensuring encrypted communications. However, no security headers were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. The presence of multiple third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. No forms or sensitive data collection points were identified, reducing immediate risk of data leakage. The absence of incident response contacts and security policies indicates a low maturity in security governance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements in headers, privacy compliance, and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve security posture.
  2. Publish clear and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Provide explicit contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and security incident reporting.
  4. Verify and update domain WHOIS registration to ensure transparency and legitimacy of the domain ownership.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and mitigate risks from third-party scripts and integrations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jaguar Iraq
Description
Since 1935, Jaguar has been at its best when looking forward. With fearless creativity at our core, we continue to challenge convention.
Key services
Automotive sales, Brand information, Vehicle configuration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vue.js (Nuxt.js), Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Twitter Ads, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads, Twitter Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Universal Website Tag
Marketing tools
Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a localized Jaguar brand site for Iraq with professional design and structured data.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection.
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the main page content.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected in the provided HTML.
  5. Multiple third-party tracking and advertising scripts are present.
  6. HTTPS is enforced with good SSL configuration.
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  8. No forms detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  9. No incident response or security policy information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Nuxt.js, a Vue.js framework, indicating a modern JavaScript single-page application architecture. It uses multiple preloaded fonts and CDN-hosted assets for performance optimization. The integration of Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, and Twitter Ads scripts shows a comprehensive marketing and analytics setup. The site is mobile optimized and uses responsive design techniques. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in accessibility and SEO. The lack of security headers and privacy policies are technical gaps that should be addressed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jaguar-iraq.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jaguar-iraq.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.