Skip to main content

Security report for jaguar.in

Jaguar Land Rover Limited · Transportation · India

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jaguar Land Rover Limited operates the www.jaguar.in website as the official digital presence for Jaguar luxury vehicles in India. The site offers comprehensive information on vehicle models, electric vehicles, special vehicle operations, and ownership services, targeting affluent customers interested in premium automotive products. The website is built on a robust technical infrastructure leveraging Adobe Experience Manager, modern JavaScript frameworks, and integrates advanced analytics and marketing tools such as Adobe Target and Google Tag Manager. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, consent-based tracking, and no evident vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear cookie and privacy policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the site reflects a mature, professional, and trustworthy digital asset aligned with Jaguar's global brand standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jaguar.in

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
55
Email security
40
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Jaguar Land Rover Limited holds a strong market position in the luxury automotive sector in India, supported by a comprehensive online platform that facilitates vehicle research, configuration, and purchase. The business model combines direct sales, fleet services, and approved used vehicle programs, supported by a network of retailers. The company benefits from its parent company Tata Motors and maintains a consistent brand presence across multiple regional domains. The partnership with findmeacar.in enhances online reservation and pricing capabilities, indicating a strategic digital ecosystem. The website's content and navigation cater effectively to the target audience, supporting lead generation and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a high level of security maturity with HTTPS enforced and several security headers present. The use of consent management scripts ensures compliance with privacy regulations. No exposed sensitive information or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. However, the absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. The site would benefit from publishing a vulnerability disclosure program and enhancing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security to further harden defenses.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact page to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Add advanced security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance user privacy controls and provide clearer information on data retention and processing practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jaguar Land Rover Limited
Description
Since 1935, Jaguar has been at its best when looking forward. With fearless creativity at our core, we continue to challenge convention.
Key services
Vehicle sales, Vehicle configuration, Test drive booking, Approved used vehicles, Fleet and business services, Retailer locator
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Adobe Target, Decibel Insight, Helix RUM, Bootstrap
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager
Platforms
Jaguar Land Rover Limited corporate platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Consent management for cookies
  • Use of Adobe Target and visitor APIs with consent checks

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Decibel Insight, Adobe Target
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Thunderhead
Tracking pixels
Decibel Insight, Adobe Target, Helix RUM, Boomerang
Marketing tools
Adobe Target, Decibel Insight
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and maintained by Jaguar Land Rover Limited.
  2. Comprehensive vehicle and ownership information provided.
  3. Strong use of modern web technologies and analytics.
  4. Good privacy and cookie consent mechanisms implemented.
  5. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious activity.
  6. Multiple regional and language versions linked via hreflang tags.
  7. No exposed sensitive data or security misconfigurations detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, a leading enterprise CMS, ensuring scalability and content management efficiency. It uses modern JavaScript libraries and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, including Adobe Target and Google Tag Manager, for personalized user experiences and data-driven marketing. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, especially in script loading and resource management. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including hreflang tags for internationalization. Hosting appears to be managed by Jaguar Land Rover or a trusted CDN provider, ensuring reliability and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jaguar.in. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jaguar.in.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.