Skip to main content

Security report for jaguar.es

Jaguar · Transportation · Spain

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jaguar, a premium automotive brand established in 1935 and owned by Jaguar Land Rover Limited, operates a comprehensive Spanish market website offering detailed information on vehicle models, financial products, rentals, and accessories. The site demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure using Adobe Experience Manager and integrates advanced analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager and Adobe Target. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit privacy policies and security incident contacts are not clearly presented in the analyzed content. Overall, the website reflects a professional and trustworthy brand presence with a focus on luxury and electric vehicles tailored for the Spanish market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048
  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jaguar.es

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
55
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention jaguar.es, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
22
Employees
0
Customers
22
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
14%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for jaguar.es.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Jaguar targets affluent consumers interested in luxury and electric vehicles in Spain, leveraging a multi-channel approach including vehicle sales, rentals, and after-sales services. The business model is supported by a robust online presence with partner domains for approved used vehicles and accessories. The company benefits from strong brand recognition and a global parent company, Jaguar Land Rover Limited. The website's extensive regional domain network indicates a broad international footprint. The digital ecosystem supports marketing, customer engagement, and e-commerce functionalities, positioning Jaguar competitively in the premium automotive sector.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and uses modern security practices such as cookie consent and asynchronous loading of tracking scripts. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts represent areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The security maturity is adequate for a commercial automotive site but could be enhanced with more transparent security governance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service with clear links accessible from all pages.
  2. Implement and publish a security policy including incident response contacts and procedures.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  4. Provide direct company contact information including verified emails and phone numbers for customer support and security reporting.
  5. Consider implementing a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jaguar
Description
Desde 1935, Jaguar ha alcanzado su máximo esplendor siempre mirando al futuro. Audaces creadores por naturaleza, seguimos desafiando las convenciones.
Key services
Vehicle sales, Vehicle rental, Service and maintenance, Financial products, Approved used vehicles, Accessories and lifestyle products
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe Helix RUM, Google Tag Manager, Adobe Target, Boomerang (performance monitoring), Web Vitals, JavaScript ES6+, CSS, HTML5
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM)
Platforms
Jaguar Land Rover Limited web platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security-related scripts loaded asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Adobe Target, Boomerang, Web Vitals
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Adobe Target, Boomerang, Web Vitals
Marketing tools
Adobe Target
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No WHOIS data available due to registry restrictions
  3. Strong brand presence and consistent design
  4. Good use of modern web technologies and analytics
  5. Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  6. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service links found in the provided HTML
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content
  8. Multiple external domains linked, mostly official Jaguar and partner domains
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and performance monitoring tools like Boomerang and Web Vitals. It uses Google Tag Manager and Adobe Target for analytics and marketing optimization. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility features and SEO metadata. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and preloading of critical resources. The technical infrastructure supports a scalable and maintainable digital presence suitable for an enterprise automotive brand.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jaguar.es. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jaguar.es.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.