Skip to main content

Security report for jaguar.co

Jaguar Columbia · Transportation · Colombia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jaguar Colombia operates as a premium automotive brand website focused on showcasing and selling Jaguar vehicles including SUVs, electric cars, sedans, and sports cars tailored for the Colombian market. The website demonstrates a strong brand presence with consistent branding and localized content, targeting consumers interested in luxury vehicles. Technically, the site is built on modern frameworks such as Nuxt.js and Vue.js, leveraging CDN assets and Google Fonts for performance and aesthetics. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks some security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Business credibility is high given the brand and consistent WHOIS data, but contact information is not explicitly found in the provided content. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and clearer contact/security information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jaguar.co

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
45
Email security
40
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Jaguar Colombia is positioned as a key player in the luxury automotive sector within Colombia, offering a range of Jaguar vehicles including electric models, which aligns with global automotive trends. The business model focuses on direct consumer engagement through an informative and visually appealing website. The extensive use of alternate language and regional links indicates a broad international partnership network. The company leverages modern web technologies to deliver a quality user experience. However, the lack of visible privacy and cookie policies may impact compliance with regional data protection regulations. The absence of direct contact details on the site could limit customer engagement and support efficiency. The brand's global reputation and consistent domain registration data support a high legitimacy and trust level.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses modern web technologies, which is positive for security. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or security policy information is provided, which is a gap in transparency and readiness. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files were found, limiting the ability for external security researchers to report issues responsibly. The site does not expose sensitive data in the visible content and does not appear to use vulnerable libraries based on the provided data. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with better header implementation and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit consent mechanisms to improve GDPR and local compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and incident response to improve trust and responsiveness.
  4. Publish a security policy and vulnerability disclosure program (security.txt) to encourage responsible reporting and demonstrate security commitment.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are included and maintain a secure technology stack.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jaguar Columbia
Description
La diferencia entre conducir y sentirte vivo la encontrarás en cada uno de nuestros modelos. Descúbrelos todos y empieza a conducir el tuyo.
Key services
Vehicle sales, Electric vehicle offerings, Model information and configurations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Nuxt.js, Vue.js, Google Fonts, CDN (cdn-jaguarlandrover.com), FontAwesome or custom icon fonts
Frameworks
Nuxt.js, Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Preconnect and preload hints for performance

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and localized for Colombia.
  2. Strong brand presence with extensive language and regional alternate links.
  3. No visible privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided content.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  7. Uses modern web technologies (Nuxt.js, Vue.js) and CDN for assets.
  8. SSL is properly configured and enforced.
  9. No advertising or tracking scripts detected in the provided content.
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Nuxt.js and Vue.js frameworks, indicating a modern and modular frontend architecture. It uses CDN-hosted fonts and images to optimize loading times. Preconnect and preload hints are used to improve performance. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data for organization and website. Accessibility is basic but present. Hosting provider details are not explicit but likely managed by Jaguar Land Rover's CDN infrastructure. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in caching and asset optimization. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless approach. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid and supports a professional user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jaguar.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jaguar.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.