Security report for jaguar-atlantm.by
ООО «Атлант-М Британия» · Transportation · Belarus
Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.
ООО «Атлант-М Британия» является официальным дилером Jaguar в Беларуси, предоставляя полный спектр услуг по продаже новых и подержанных автомобилей, сервисному обслуживанию, корпоративным продажам и финансовым программам. Сайт демонстрирует широкий модельный ряд Jaguar и ориентирован на покупателей из Беларуси и СНГ. Технически сайт построен на современном стеке с использованием множества аналитических и маркетинговых инструментов, обеспечивая хорошую производительность и мобильную оптимизацию. С точки зрения безопасности, сайт использует HTTPS и реализует cookie consent, однако отсутствуют некоторые расширенные заголовки безопасности и публичные политики безопасности. В целом, сайт демонстрирует высокий уровень профессионализма, прозрачности и доверия, что подтверждается наличием официальных контактных данных и социальных сетей.
Scanned
NIS2 and GDPR posture
- GDPR outside view
- 68/ 100 · Medium
- Checks completed
- 7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
- (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
- (b) Incident handling: One indicator
- (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
- (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
- (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
- (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
- (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
- (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
- (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
- (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
- High
No Cookie Consent Banner found
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
- GDPR Art. 7
- ePrivacy Art. 5(3)
- NIST PT-4: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 PT-4: Consent
- High
SSL/TLS
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
- High
Weak Protocols Supported
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
- CWE-327
- OWASP A04:2025
- ASVS V12.1.1
- RFC 8996
- RFC 7568
- Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: tls_versions TLSv1.2, TLSv1.3
- NIS2 21(2)(h)
- IR 2024/2690 9.2(b): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(b): Cryptography
- NIST SC-8(1): NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-8(1): Cryptographic Protection
- High
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
Keep watching jaguar-atlantm.by
This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended€25per month
- TLS certificates and expiry
- DNS records
- SPF, DKIM and DMARC
- Security headers
- GDPR and NIS2 posture
- Exposed services
- Third-party trackers
- Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
Full report
€39.90one-time
- The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
- Email delivery with an unlock code
- Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
- SSL/TLS
- 72
- Security headers
- 75
- Email security
- 70
- DNS health
- 75
- Network security
- 100
- GDPR outside view
- 68
- Average
- 77
Not counted
- NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
- OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
- The certificate is not trusted by browsers
- The website is not served over HTTPS
- A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
- The page loads a script from a compromised source
- The domain registration has expired
- SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
- Critical0–25
- High26–49
- Medium50–75
- Low76–100
Technical appendix
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Security posture
Recommendations
- Внедрить и проверить заголовки безопасности Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options и X-Content-Type-Options.
- Опубликовать политику безопасности и контактные данные для инцидентов безопасности.
- Регулярно проводить аудит сторонних скриптов и библиотек на предмет уязвимостей.
- Обеспечить защиту форм от CSRF и внедрить валидацию пользовательского ввода.
- Разработать и внедрить политику раскрытия уязвимостей (vulnerability disclosure).
Contact details published on the site
- Addresses
- Legal name
- ООО «Атлант-М Британия»
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
- Company
- ООО «Атлант-М Британия»
- Description
- Официальный дилер Jaguar в Беларуси, предлагающий продажу новых и подержанных автомобилей Jaguar, сервисное обслуживание, корпоративные продажи и финансовые предложения.
- Key services
- Продажа новых автомобилей Jaguar, Продажа автомобилей с пробегом, Сервисное обслуживание и ремонт, Корпоративные продажи, Финансовые программы и кредитование, Онлайн-конфигуратор и тест-драйв
- Content quality
- excellent
- Branding
- consistent
Technology
- Stack
- JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, Roistat, AdRoll, Bitrix24 CRM widgets
- Performance
- moderate
- Mobile
- good
- Accessibility
- good
- SEO
- good
Security
- Observed score
- 80/100
- Good practices seen
- HTTPS enabled
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Use of multiple analytics and tracking scripts with consent
- Cookie consent mechanism implemented
Analytics and tracking
- Services
- Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, Roistat
- Tracking level
- extensive
- Privacy practices
- good
Advertising
- Ad networks
- Google Ads, AdRoll, Mail.ru Advertising, Dentsu DSP
- Tracking pixels
- Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, Yandex Metrika, Roistat, VK Retargeting
- Marketing tools
- Roistat, Smartpoint
- Transparency
- good
Site quality
- Design
- excellent
- User experience
- excellent
- Content relevance
- excellent
- Navigation
- excellent
- Professionalism
- excellent
- Trustworthiness
- high
Key observations
- Website is a professional official Jaguar dealer site for Belarus.
- Comprehensive content with detailed vehicle models and services.
- Multiple analytics and marketing tools integrated with cookie consent.
- Clear contact information and social media presence.
- No signs of malicious content or security blocking.
- Good SEO and accessibility practices observed.
Technical notes
Notes
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
- MITRE CWE (opens in a new tab)4.20 (2026-04-30) · CWE Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP Top 10:2025 (opens in a new tab)2025 (membership per CWE 4.20) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- MITRE CAPEC (opens in a new tab)3.9 (2023-01-24) · CAPEC Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP ASVS (opens in a new tab)5.0.0 · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (opens in a new tab)latest (checklist.json, master) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Secure Headers Project (opens in a new tab)2026-10-18 · Apache-2.0
- Mozilla Server Side TLS (intermediate) (opens in a new tab)6.0 · MPL-2.0
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 (OSCAL catalog) (opens in a new tab)5.2.0 · Public domain (US Government work)
- Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 333, 27.12.2022 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 (opens in a new tab)OJ L, 18.10.2024 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 119, 4.5.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy), consolidated (opens in a new tab)19.12.2009 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- RFC Editor metadata (opens in a new tab)per-RFC (obsolete RFCs rejected) · IETF Trust Legal Provisions (metadata only)
- NIST CSRC, W3C TR, IETF Datatracker, EDPB, EUR-Lex CELLAR and gesetze-bayern.de (opens in a new tab)per document · Titles and links only
- NIST NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens in a new tab)live records · Public domain (NVD); CVE® records © MITRE, free use
- W3C WCAG 2.2 (opens in a new tab)W3C Recommendation (wcag.json) · W3C Software and Document License
- ETSI EN 301 549 (opens in a new tab)V3.2.1 (2021-03), clause headings · Clause numbers and titles only (© ETSI)
- Directive (EU) 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 151, 7.6.2019 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive (EU) 2016/2102 (Web Accessibility Directive) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 327, 2.12.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Feedback on this report
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with jaguar-atlantm.by. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jaguar-atlantm.by.