Skip to main content

Security report for jaeger.co.uk

Marks & Spencer · Retail · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Marks & Spencer operates the Jaeger clothing brand through a comprehensive e-commerce platform offering a wide range of premium apparel for men and women. The website showcases a well-structured catalog with detailed product filters, supporting a seamless shopping experience. The technical infrastructure leverages modern web technologies including React and Next.js, integrated with advanced analytics and performance monitoring tools such as New Relic and Dynatrace. Security is robust with HTTPS enforcement, comprehensive security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is strong, featuring clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the site reflects a mature digital presence aligned with enterprise-level retail standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
48/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jaeger.co.uk

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
48
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business is positioned as a premium fashion retailer under the Marks & Spencer umbrella, targeting discerning customers seeking quality and timeless style. The e-commerce model is supported by extensive product offerings, loyalty programs, and multi-channel engagement including social media and newsletters. The partnership ecosystem includes regional sites and related brands, enhancing market reach. The company demonstrates strong brand consistency and trust signals, supported by customer reviews and structured data for SEO.

Security posture

The security posture is mature, with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers implemented. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. The site uses secure forms and integrates security monitoring tools. However, there is no explicit public security policy or incident response information available, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a formal security policy and incident response plan to increase transparency.
  2. Establish a public vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance form security by ensuring anti-CSRF tokens and input validation are in place.
  5. Continue to monitor and optimize privacy compliance in line with evolving regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Marks & Spencer
Description
Jaeger is a heritage British brand offering premium clothing collections for men and women, including tailored jackets, dresses, and casual wear. The collection is available via Marks & Spencer, featuring quality fabrics and contemporary yet timeless styles.
Key services
Online retail of clothing and accessories, In-store shopping, Home delivery and returns, Customer account management, Loyalty program (Sparks)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Next.js), Optimizely, Tealium (utag.js), New Relic, Dynatrace, OneTrust (cookie consent), GraphQL, Apollo, SWR, CSS Modules
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Platforms
Marks & Spencer e-commerce platform
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with proper input types
  • Use of modern libraries with no known vulnerabilities

Analytics and tracking

Services
New Relic, Dynatrace, mParticle
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Optimizely
Tracking pixels
New Relic, Dynatrace, Tealium
Marketing tools
Tealium, Optimizely, mParticle
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a branded e-commerce platform for Jaeger clothing under Marks & Spencer
  2. Comprehensive product listings with detailed filters and categories
  3. Strong use of structured data for SEO and accessibility
  4. Multiple security and performance monitoring tools integrated
  5. Clear privacy, cookie, and terms policies with consent mechanisms
  6. No signs of blocking or WAF challenges
  7. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks
  8. Active customer engagement via newsletter and social media
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React/Next.js framework with server-side rendering and GraphQL APIs, ensuring fast and responsive user experience. Integration with multiple analytics and marketing tools indicates a high level of digital maturity. The site is well-optimized for mobile and accessibility, with comprehensive SEO metadata and structured data. Hosting appears robust with CDN usage and performance monitoring. Technical risks are minimal but should be managed through continuous updates and security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jaeger.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jaeger.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.