Skip to main content

Security report for jack.org

Jack.org · Non-profit · Canada

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jack.org is a Canadian non-profit organization dedicated to youth mental health support and education. It operates the largest network of young people supporting each other in Canada, offering programs such as mental health presentations (Jack Talks), community chapters, and training to safely support peers (Be There). The organization also provides resources for youth and supporters and runs fundraising initiatives to sustain its mission. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting young Canadians and mental health advocates. Technically, the site is built on Webflow, leveraging modern analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Sentry for error monitoring. It is well optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and standard security headers, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly disclosed. Privacy compliance is evident through a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and professional digital presence for a medium-sized non-profit organization.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jack.org

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
95
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention jack.org, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for jack.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Jack.org holds a strong market position as Canada's leading youth mental health network. Its business model focuses on non-profit fundraising, community engagement, and educational outreach. Revenue streams likely include donations, corporate partnerships, and fundraising events such as the Jack Ride. The target customer segment is primarily young people in Canada and mental health supporters. The organization maintains partnerships with payment processors and event platforms, indicating a mature operational ecosystem. Growth indicators include multiple program offerings and a broad resource base. The website's clear calls to action for donations and involvement support ongoing engagement and funding efforts.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and use of reputable third-party services for analytics and error tracking. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a public security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure page suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. The cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy indicate compliance with privacy regulations. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by publishing explicit security governance documents and dedicated security contact channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  2. Create a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt page to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Add explicit security and abuse contact emails to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and tracking pixels for security risks.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to reflect evolving regulations and practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jack.org
Description
Jack.org is Canada's largest network of young people supporting young people. Help us change the mental health landscape, one conversation at a time.
Key services
Mental health presentations (Jack Talks), Community chapters, Mental health support training (Be There), Resources for youth and supporters, Fundraising and donation programs
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Sentry (error tracking), Amazon Ads, Facebook Pixel, Reddit Pixel, Google Analytics
Platforms
Webflow
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with preferences
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JS libraries with integrity
  • Error tracking with Sentry

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Sentry
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Amazon Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Reddit Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Focuses on youth mental health support and education in Canada.
  3. Uses modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  4. Includes cookie consent and privacy policy indicating GDPR compliance.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML; contact via form.
  6. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure found.
  7. WHOIS data is malformed or privacy protected, limiting domain registration insights.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow platform, utilizing modern front-end technologies and third-party integrations for analytics, error tracking, and advertising. Performance is optimized with fast loading times and excellent mobile responsiveness. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility features are present but could be further enhanced with ARIA roles and keyboard navigation improvements. The technical infrastructure is robust for a non-profit organization, with opportunities to improve security transparency and incident management capabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jack.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jack.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.