Skip to main content

Security report for jac.be

CAW Groep vzw · Non-profit · Belgium

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CAW Groep vzw operates as a non-profit organization focused on providing social welfare and support services primarily to youth and adults in Belgium. The website serves as a portal for the JAC (Jongeren Advies Centrum), a youth advice center under CAW, offering information, counseling, crisis help, and community support. The organization holds a strong market position as a trusted regional welfare entity with a comprehensive service offering. Technically, the website is built on WordPress, leveraging modern web technologies such as Google Tag Manager and Typekit fonts, with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some advanced security headers and explicit incident response policies are absent. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR, reflecting a mature digital presence for a non-profit entity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jac.be

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
60
Email security
55
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CAW Groep's market positioning is that of a well-established non-profit welfare provider in Belgium, focusing on youth and adult social services. Their competitive advantage lies in their broad service portfolio, regional presence, and trusted reputation. The business model is service-oriented, funded likely through public and private means typical for non-profits. Revenue streams are not explicit but presumably include government funding and donations. Target customers are vulnerable youth and adults seeking social support. Growth indicators include active social media engagement and continuous content updates. The partnership ecosystem includes digital service providers like Mr. Henry for website development. Strategic observations highlight a focus on accessibility, trust, and community engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms implemented. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of a published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy indicate room for improvement. GDPR compliance is evident through privacy and cookie policies. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not publicly documented, which is common for non-profit organizations but could be enhanced to improve trust and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Develop and make publicly available an incident response policy and security contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Create a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from external libraries.
  5. Enhance contact information availability by providing verified company emails and phone numbers for support and security inquiries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CAW Groep vzw
Description
Het Centrum Algemeen Welzijnswerk (CAW) helpt mensen met al hun vragen en problemen die te maken hebben met welzijn.
Key services
Information, advice and short-term help, Meeting and social support, Guidance and counseling, Crisis assistance for minors, Shelter and prevention
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Typekit Fonts, Imgix for image optimization, Custom JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Professional privacy policy

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Dutch language
  2. Strong focus on youth welfare and social support
  3. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious behavior
  4. Good compliance with GDPR and cookie consent
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers visible on main page; contact via forms
  6. WHOIS data is restricted by registry policy, common for .be domains
  7. Use of modern web technologies and optimized images
  8. Social media presence on major platforms with official accounts
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with integration of Google Tag Manager for analytics and Typekit for fonts, indicating a modern and maintainable tech stack. Images are optimized using Imgix, contributing to moderate to good performance. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA labels. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit but the site uses HTTPS with a valid certificate, indicating a secure hosting environment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jac.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jac.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.