Skip to main content

Security report for its-estonia.com

ITS Estonia · Transportation · Estonia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ITS Estonia is a specialized platform uniting the intelligent transportation and logistics systems community within Estonia. It serves as a cooperation and innovation hub for public and private sectors, supporting knowledge sharing, export development, and pilot projects in smart mobility. The website reflects a focused business model targeting ITS stakeholders and companies, with a clear national and international collaboration emphasis. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor, leveraging modern web technologies and integrating GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. The presence of Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel indicates moderate user tracking balanced with privacy considerations. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections, though DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are not evident, suggesting room for improvement. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-aligned with its business objectives, though it lacks explicit contact and security policy details.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching its-estonia.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
95
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions ITS Estonia as a key player in Estonia's ITS ecosystem, backed by the Estonian ICT Cluster. Its business model revolves around fostering innovation, facilitating export, and piloting ITS solutions. The target audience includes government entities, private ITS companies, and international ITS networks. The site’s content and linked partner domains reinforce its credibility and integration within Estonia's digital and industrial landscape. The absence of direct contact details may indicate a focus on organizational rather than direct consumer engagement. The partnership ecosystem is strong, with links to official Estonian digital and industry initiatives, enhancing its market position and growth potential.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer restrictions. The use of a GDPR cookie compliance plugin and visible cookie consent mechanisms indicate compliance with privacy regulations. However, the lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options represent potential vulnerabilities. No security policy or incident response contacts are published, which could hinder effective communication in case of security incidents. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing additional DNS and HTTP security measures and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to minimize vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security assessments to maintain compliance and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ITS Estonia
Description
ITS Estonia unites the intelligent transportation and logistic systems (ITS) community in Estonia. It provides easy access to Estonian achievements in smart mobility and covers innovative solutions that increase effectiveness, safety, and sustainability of transport and logistics.
Key services
Cooperation platform, Knowledge dissemination, Export and development support, Pilot project initiation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Elementor 3.31.2, jQuery 3.7.1, Moove GDPR Cookie Compliance plugin, Google Fonts, Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional platform for ITS community in Estonia.
  2. Content is well-structured and relevant to the target audience.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and accessible.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the homepage.
  5. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and plugins.
  7. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a minor security gap.
  8. No visible security headers detected in the HTML content.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. No incident response or security contact information provided.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder, using jQuery and standard web fonts from Google Fonts. It integrates third-party analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel, managed via GDPR-compliant consent mechanisms. The site shows good mobile optimization and SEO practices with proper meta tags and alternate language links. Performance is moderate, with some custom scrollbar scripts and lazy loading for images. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The site lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which are recommended for improved security posture. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with its-estonia.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review its-estonia.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.