Skip to main content

Security report for it-wms.com

WMS WebMediaSolutions GmbH · Technology · Austria

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WMS WebMediaSolutions GmbH operates a professional website offering specialized panoramic and livestream camera solutions for sectors including tourism, construction, industry, and meteorology. The company emphasizes robust outdoor systems with in-house software development, enabling customized and flexible solutions. Their market position is that of a niche technology provider with a focus on B2B clients requiring advanced camera and livestreaming technologies. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like Bootstrap and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Matomo, and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile-optimized, SEO-friendly, and includes a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses bot management and reCAPTCHA services. However, it lacks explicit security headers and documented incident response policies. No critical vulnerabilities were detected in the visible content or scripts. Privacy compliance is strong with clear policies and consent management. A notable risk is the absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain, which is inconsistent with the active and professional nature of the website. This discrepancy lowers the overall trust score and suggests further verification is needed. Overall, the website is well-constructed, secure, and compliant, but domain registration transparency should be addressed.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching it-wms.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets business clients in technology-driven sectors requiring panoramic and livestream camera solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in in-house software development and tailored solutions for diverse environments. Revenue streams likely include product sales, software licenses, and maintenance contracts. The partnership ecosystem includes social media platforms and analytics providers. Growth indicators include active content updates and multi-language support. Strategic observations highlight a focus on niche markets with specialized hardware and software integration.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate to high, with HTTPS enforced and use of bot management and reCAPTCHA to mitigate spam and automated attacks. Privacy compliance is evident through cookie consent and GDPR-aligned policies. However, the absence of security headers and incident response information indicates room for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The company should enhance transparency around security policies and consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen security posture.
  2. Publish an incident response policy and contact information for security issues to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Verify and update domain WHOIS registration information to improve trust and legitimacy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
WMS WebMediaSolutions GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
WMS WebMediaSolutions GmbH
Description
Web Media Solutions - your competent partner in livestreaming, panocams, webcams, webphotopoints, traffic cams and more.
Key services
Live Panorama Cameras, Construction Site Cameras, PanoCloud Viewer, Virtual Reality Cameras, ActionPhotoCam with Video, Cameras for Industry, Add-ons like Weather Stations, Cellular/WLAN network, Solar panels, Maintenance contracts
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Bootstrap CSS/JS, FontAwesome icons, Yoast SEO plugin, CookieYes consent management, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Matomo Analytics, SearchWP Live Ajax Search, Easy Image Gallery, Everest Tab Lite plugin
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with customization
  • Google reCAPTCHA usage
  • Cloudflare Bot Management cookie present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo Analytics, Vimeo tracking
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
LinkedIn Ads, Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Matomo Analytics, CookieYes
Marketing tools
Google Ads, CookieYes Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. Professional business website for panoramic and livestream camera solutions
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy present
  4. No security blocking or WAF detected
  5. WHOIS data missing or domain unregistered, which is suspicious
  6. Multiple social media and external links to reputable platforms
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with Bootstrap for responsive design and FontAwesome for icons. It integrates multiple analytics platforms including Google Analytics and Matomo, and uses CookieYes for consent management. Performance is moderate with caching and minified CSS/JS assets. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with Yoast SEO plugin. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require regular security audits. Hosting provider details are not explicit, and domain registration data is missing, which could pose operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 54/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with it-wms.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review it-wms.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.