Skip to main content

Security report for ipics.click

See PrivacyGuardian.org · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.ipics.click operates as an image hosting platform with explicit support for adult content uploads. It provides users with single, multiple, and remote image upload functionalities, targeting a general audience with an option for adult content. The business model revolves around user-generated content hosting, monetized likely through advertising networks such as JuicyAds. The site is relatively new, founded in 2024, and uses privacy protection for domain registration, which is common for adult content services. Technically, the site employs legacy JavaScript libraries including jQuery 1.7.1 and Uploadify, alongside Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking. The hosting and DNS are managed via NameSilo and fastssdserver.com respectively. The site shows basic mobile optimization and accessibility but lacks modern security headers and DNSSEC, indicating moderate technical maturity. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers and uses outdated libraries, which may expose it to vulnerabilities. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms and limited privacy policy details suggest partial GDPR compliance. The WHOIS data indicates privacy protection, which aligns with the adult content nature but reduces transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement. The overall risk assessment highlights the need for updating technical components, enhancing security headers, and implementing privacy compliance mechanisms. Strategic recommendations include modernizing the tech stack, enabling DNSSEC, enforcing HTTPS, and improving transparency to build user trust and comply with regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ipics.click

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ipics.click, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ipics.click.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the technology sector, specifically in image hosting with adult content options. It targets users seeking free image upload and sharing services, including adult content uploaders. The business model appears ad-supported, leveraging JuicyAds and Google Analytics for monetization and user tracking. Market positioning is niche, focusing on adult and non-adult image hosting. The company is small, newly founded in 2024, with no visible parent or subsidiary companies. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers limits business credibility. Growth potential depends on improving security, compliance, and user trust. No strategic partnerships or certifications are evident.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate to low. Key vulnerabilities include outdated JavaScript libraries, lack of DNSSEC, and absence of security headers such as CSP or HSTS. No incident response or security policy information is provided. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is justified but reduces transparency. No exposed sensitive data or malware indicators were found. The site should prioritize updating libraries, enabling DNSSEC, implementing security headers, and establishing clear incident response contacts to improve security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Update all JavaScript libraries to current secure versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  2. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security and trust.
  3. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Add a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance privacy transparency.
  5. Publish clear security policies and incident response contact information to build user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
See PrivacyGuardian.org
Description
Image hosting and sharing platform allowing users to upload and share images with options for adult or non-adult content.
Key services
Single image upload, Multiple image upload, Remote image upload via URL
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.7.1, jQuery UI 1.8.18, Uploadify v2.1.4, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Client transfer prohibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
JuicyAds
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an image hosting platform with adult content options
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie consent mechanisms detected
  3. Uses outdated JavaScript libraries which may pose security risks
  4. No visible security headers or HTTPS enforcement details in provided data
  5. WHOIS data shows privacy protection and recent registration
  6. Site includes Google Analytics and JuicyAds advertising network
  7. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found
  8. Contact available only via contact form page
  9. Basic site design and navigation with moderate branding consistency
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.7.1 and Uploadify v2.1.4, which are outdated and may contain known vulnerabilities. The site integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking and marketing purposes. Hosting is managed via NameSilo registrar with DNS servers at fastssdserver.com. The site has basic mobile optimization and accessibility but lacks modern CMS or frameworks. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization techniques detected. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates technical debt and potential risks. Modernization opportunities include upgrading the tech stack, enabling DNSSEC, and improving security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ipics.click. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ipics.click.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.