Skip to main content

Security report for ipcamlive.com

IPCamLive Inc. · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

IPCamLive Inc. operates a cloud-based video broadcasting platform specializing in embedding live IP camera streams into web pages and generating time-lapse videos. The company targets IP camera users, developers, and businesses seeking easy integration of live video content across multiple platforms including PC, Mac, iOS, and Android. Their business model is subscription-based SaaS with a free trial offering, positioning them as a niche provider in the IP camera streaming market. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Google Tag Manager, supporting responsive design and multi-platform compatibility. The infrastructure supports direct IP camera streaming without additional software, unlimited viewers, and privacy features like AI-based face blurring and stream access controls. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and privacy controls implemented, but lacks explicit security headers and published incident response policies. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises some trust concerns, although the website content and business presence appear legitimate. Privacy compliance is basic with cookie consent and privacy policy present but no explicit GDPR confirmation. Overall, the website is professionally designed and functional with good user experience and relevant content. Strategic improvements in security policies, WHOIS transparency, and compliance documentation would enhance trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ipcamlive.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

IPCamLive holds a focused market position as a technology provider for IP camera live streaming and time-lapse video generation. Their competitive advantage lies in ease of integration, direct camera stream support, and privacy features. Revenue streams are primarily subscription-based with additional partner and affiliate programs. The target customers include individual IP camera owners, small businesses, and developers needing embedded live video solutions. Growth indicators include active partner listings and continuous feature updates. The partnership ecosystem includes major IP camera manufacturers, enhancing credibility and market reach. Operationally, the company maintains a small but consistent digital presence with professional content and social media engagement.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, and privacy controls such as cookie consent and face blur features are present. However, the lack of HTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) and absence of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate gaps in security best practices. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms were found, limiting transparency. The use of third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. Overall, the site demonstrates awareness of privacy but requires enhancements in security governance and incident readiness to meet higher compliance standards such as GDPR or NIS2.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security collaboration.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by explicitly addressing GDPR requirements and data retention policies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
IPCamLive Inc.
Description
Cloud based video broadcasting solution for IP cameras to embed live video streams and generate time-lapse videos.
Key services
Live video streaming embedding, Time-lapse video generation, Direct IP camera stream support, Unlimited viewers streaming, Privacy control with face blur, Stream domain lock, Pin lock access control, Social media streaming integration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.0, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, HTML5 Video Player, Slick Slider
Platforms
PC, Mac, iOS, Android, Windows Phone
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • Stream domain lock feature
  • Pin lock for stream access
  • Face blur privacy control

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.
  2. No WAF or security challenge detected.
  3. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  4. Privacy and terms policies are present but basic.
  5. Contact information is available via email and support form.
  6. Multiple third-party tracking and marketing scripts are used.
  7. Website targets IP camera users and businesses needing live streaming.
  8. Good technical implementation with modern JS libraries and responsive design.
  9. Security headers and explicit security policies are lacking.
  10. No evidence of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with jQuery 3.7.0, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The video streaming player is custom and supports HTML5 video embedding with responsive design. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and adaptive video sizing. The site is mobile optimized and accessible at a basic level. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom-built or static site. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Technical debt appears low but security-related technical improvements are needed. Overall, the infrastructure supports the business model effectively but could benefit from enhanced security and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ipcamlive.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ipcamlive.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.