Skip to main content

Security report for intersystems.com

InterSystems Corporation · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

InterSystems Corporation is a leading enterprise software company specializing in data management and healthcare information systems. Established in 1996 and headquartered in the United States, the company offers high-performance cloud data platforms and interoperability solutions trusted by global leaders across healthcare, finance, supply chain, and manufacturing sectors. Their business model focuses on providing robust, scalable, and secure data platforms that enable organizations to unlock the potential of their data for better decision-making and operational efficiency. Technically, InterSystems employs modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and WebComponents, supported by a robust CMS (Brightspot) and hosted on a reliable platform (Akamai). The website demonstrates excellent performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Privacy and compliance are well addressed with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, GDPR compliance, and consent mechanisms implemented via OneTrust. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, utilizes security headers, and avoids exposing sensitive data. While no critical vulnerabilities or security issues were detected, the site could enhance its security posture by publishing explicit incident response contacts and adopting a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosures. Overall, InterSystems presents a highly professional, trustworthy, and well-maintained online presence that aligns with its market position as a trusted provider of critical data management solutions. The company’s global reach, comprehensive product offerings, and strong compliance practices contribute to a low-risk profile with strategic opportunities for further security transparency.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of intersystems.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
63/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching intersystems.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
63
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

InterSystems holds a strong market position as a provider of data management and healthcare IT solutions, serving enterprise clients globally. Their competitive advantages include a unique architectural approach that brings processing closer to data, enabling faster and more secure operations. The company’s revenue streams likely derive from software licenses, cloud services, support, and professional services. Target customers include healthcare providers, financial services firms, supply chain organizations, and manufacturers. Growth indicators include a broad product portfolio, active global offices, and partnerships with major cloud providers (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud). The partnership ecosystem is robust, including implementation partners and technology alliances. Strategic observations highlight a focus on AI readiness, interoperability, and smart data fabrics as key growth areas.

Security posture

InterSystems demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of security headers, and comprehensive privacy and cookie consent mechanisms. No exposed credentials or sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The site uses reputable third-party services for analytics and marketing, with transparent user consent. Compliance with GDPR is evident through detailed privacy policies and cookie management. However, the absence of explicit incident response contact information and a security.txt file indicates room for improvement in vulnerability disclosure and incident management transparency. Overall, the security culture appears strong, supporting the company’s role in mission-critical applications.

Recommendations

  1. Publish explicit incident response and security contact information on the website.
  2. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  3. Enhance transparency around the Data Protection Officer contact details.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts to avoid potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Continue to monitor and improve accessibility and privacy compliance features.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
InterSystems Corporation
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
InterSystems Corporation
Description
InterSystems is the leading provider of data management solutions for industries with complex challenges. Unlock the potential of your data and move your business forward.
Key services
Data management platforms, Healthcare information systems, Cloud data platforms, Interoperability solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, WebComponents, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Platforms
Cloud-based services, Web platform
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with OneTrust
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers (inferred)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
OneTrust
Marketing tools
Drift Chat, HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Comprehensive product and solution offerings in data management and healthcare IT.
  2. Strong global presence with multiple country-specific sites.
  3. Robust privacy and cookie consent mechanisms implemented.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimization.
  5. Clear and accessible contact information with multiple channels.
  6. No signs of security or content blocking issues.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern and robust technical infrastructure using HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and WebComponents. It leverages Brightspot CMS for content management and is hosted on Akamai, ensuring high availability and performance. The site includes advanced privacy and consent management via OneTrust and integrates marketing tools like Drift Chat and HubSpot. Performance is optimized with responsive images and lazy loading. The technical implementation supports a fast, accessible, and SEO-friendly user experience with no detected technical debt or critical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100Medium16 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with intersystems.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review intersystems.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.