Interfit is a world-leading specialty tire and wheel service provider focusing on Material Handling, Agriculture, and Construction sectors. The company offers a wide range of products and services designed to help machine specialists maximize revenue by maintaining control over their tire business. The website is professionally designed, multi-lingual, and optimized for SEO and mobile devices, reflecting a mature digital presence. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress with Elementor and includes modern tools such as Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA to enhance security and analytics. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, although the absence of security headers and incident response information suggests room for improvement. The WHOIS data is missing, indicating either a very recent domain registration or privacy protection, which slightly impacts trustworthiness. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and compliant with privacy regulations, suitable for its business audience.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
71
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention interfit-group.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for interfit-group.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Interfit operates in the transportation sector, specializing in tires and wheels for industrial and agricultural machinery. Its market position as a world leader is supported by a broad service offering and global reach, evidenced by multi-language support and regional sites. The business model centers on service excellence and product expertise, targeting machine specialists in niche markets. The website content and structure indicate a medium-sized enterprise with a focus on B2B customers. The company leverages partnerships with major platforms like Google for marketing and analytics. No direct contact emails or phone numbers are published, relying on contact forms for communication. The absence of public WHOIS data suggests a need for further verification of domain legitimacy.
Security posture
The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, and implements a detailed cookie consent banner aligned with GDPR requirements. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which could hinder transparency and readiness in case of security incidents. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The security score is good but could be improved by adding security headers and publishing security policies.
Recommendations
Implement and configure security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and readiness.
Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
Make contact information such as support emails or phone numbers more accessible to improve business credibility and user trust.
Regularly monitor domain registration status and update WHOIS information to ensure legitimacy and trust.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Interfit
Description
World leading specialty tire and wheel service provider. Excellence in service, tire expertise and wide range of products for Material Handling, Agriculture and Construction machine specialists.
Key services
Tire and wheel service, Material Handling tires, Agriculture tires, Construction tires
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, jQuery, Swiper.js
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
Cookie consent with granular controls
Google reCAPTCHA for forms
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good
Advertising
Ad networks
Google Marketing Platform, DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
YouTube
Transparency
good
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with rich content
Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with detailed categories
Multi-language support with many regional versions
No exposed emails or phone numbers found in HTML
Contact available only via contact form
No explicit security policy or incident response information
No terms of service page detected
Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js for sliders and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is multi-lingual with hreflang tags for regional targeting. Performance is moderate with some optimization opportunities. Accessibility features are present, including skip links and ARIA attributes. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin and proper meta tags including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection on forms. No hosting provider information was detected. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from additional security hardening and performance tuning.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with interfit-group.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review interfit-group.com.