Skip to main content

Security report for interaliaproject.com

Inter Alia · Non-profit · Greece

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Inter Alia is a small, established non-profit organization based in Greece, focused on fostering civic engagement, education, youth empowerment, arts, and culture across Europe. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear navigation and multilingual support. Their key services include educational programs, political engagement initiatives, and cultural projects, supported by an active membership and partnership network. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including popular plugins for SEO, accessibility, and cookie compliance. The hosting provider is OVH sas, and the domain has been active since 2013, aligning well with the organization's history. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, though some security headers could be improved. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected. Overall, the website demonstrates a mature digital presence suitable for its non-profit mission.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching interaliaproject.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
65
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Inter Alia occupies a niche in the European non-profit sector, focusing on civic action and cultural engagement. Their business model relies on membership programs, partnerships, and event-driven activities. The organization maintains transparency through yearly reports and identity disclosures. Their digital ecosystem includes active social media channels and a multilingual website, enhancing outreach. The partnership with Stinpriza and use of Grace Themes for design indicates collaboration with specialized service providers. Growth indicators include ongoing membership recruitment and diverse program offerings. The website content and structure support their mission and target audience effectively.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. Cookie consent is managed via a GDPR-compliant banner with granular controls, reflecting good privacy practices. No security.txt or explicit incident response policies are found, which could be areas for improvement. The absence of security headers like CSP or HSTS reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerable or outdated libraries were detected in the provided content. Forms such as the contact form use Contact Form 7, a widely used and maintained plugin. Overall, the security posture is solid for a non-profit but could benefit from enhanced HTTP headers and documented incident response.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures and improve transparency.
  4. Document and publish a security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and partners.
  5. Maintain regular updates of WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Inter Alia
Description
Civic Action Meeting Point
Key services
Education programs, Political engagement initiatives, Youth empowerment, Arts and culture projects, Membership programme, Events and calls, Digital library
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Nivo Slider, Owl Carousel, Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, WPML (multilingual), Cookie Law Info plugin, WP Accessibility plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (WP Accessibility, Cookie Law Info)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally maintained non-profit organization site
  2. Clear navigation with multilingual support (English and Greek)
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with GDPR compliance
  4. Active social media presence linked in header and footer
  5. Contact information clearly displayed including phone, email, and physical address
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  7. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond cookie consent
  8. Good use of accessibility tools and plugins
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a well-structured theme and multiple plugins enhancing SEO, accessibility, and user experience. The use of jQuery and popular sliders/carousels indicates a traditional but effective front-end approach. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading speed and resource management. Mobile optimization and accessibility features are well implemented, including a11y toolbar and font size/contrast toggles. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin and proper meta tags including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting by OVH sas is reliable, but enabling DNSSEC would strengthen infrastructure security. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the organization's digital goals effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with interaliaproject.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review interaliaproject.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.