Skip to main content

Security report for intelligentvideo.tv

L.B. Foster · Transportation · United Kingdom

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and GDPR outside view.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

L.B. Foster is an established company founded in 1996, specializing in transportation and technology solutions, particularly digital signage for retail, corporate, and Digital Out of Home (DOOH) markets. The company positions itself as a leading provider in these sectors, offering tailored digital signage and rail infrastructure technology solutions. The website reflects a professional B2B business model targeting retail and corporate clients with a focus on enhancing brand visibility and engagement. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript frameworks such as Alpine.js, integrates Google Tag Manager and Weglot for analytics and multilingual support, and is hosted on Azure DNS infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and basic accessibility features, providing a moderate performance experience. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and implements a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. However, some security headers like Content-Security-Policy and Referrer-Policy are not detected, suggesting room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. Overall, the website demonstrates a solid security posture and business credibility with clear contact information and trust indicators. The domain WHOIS data aligns well with the business claims, reinforcing legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers and maintaining regular audits of third-party scripts to further strengthen security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching intelligentvideo.tv

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
85
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

L.B. Foster operates in the transportation and technology sectors with a strong focus on rail infrastructure and digital signage solutions. The company leverages a B2B business model targeting retail, corporate, and DOOH markets. Their market positioning as a leading provider is supported by a comprehensive product and service portfolio, including rail products, technology solutions, and infrastructure services. The company maintains a multilingual website to serve a global audience, indicating international market reach. Partnerships and investor relations are managed through dedicated subdomains, reflecting organizational maturity. The business model likely includes direct sales, partnerships, and service contracts, with growth potential in digital signage and rail technology innovations.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS enforcement and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. Security best practices such as no exposed sensitive data and use of reputable third-party services are observed. However, the absence of certain security headers like Content-Security-Policy and Referrer-Policy indicates potential gaps that could be exploited in advanced attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are publicly available, which could limit transparency and responsiveness in case of security events. Overall, the site is secure for typical business operations but would benefit from enhanced header policies and documented security governance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header to mitigate cross-site scripting and data injection attacks.
  2. Add Referrer-Policy header to control information sent in the Referer header and enhance privacy.
  3. Include X-Frame-Options header to prevent clickjacking attacks.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Document and publish incident response procedures and security policies to strengthen security culture and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
L.B. Foster
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
L.B. Foster
Description
Skratch is a leading provider of digital signage for retail, corporate and Digital out of Home (DOOH). That elevates brand visibility, engagement and revolutionise retail spaces.
Key services
Digital signage solutions, Rail and transport technology solutions, Infrastructure products and services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Alpine.js, Google Tag Manager, Weglot translation, Termly cookie consent
Frameworks
Alpine.js
Platforms
Azure DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
Weglot translation, Termly cookie consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL.
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via Termly.
  3. Structured data (JSON-LD) present for Organization and LocalBusiness.
  4. Multiple language support via Weglot.
  5. No contact forms detected on this page; contact info via JSON-LD only.
  6. No explicit privacy policy URL found in HTML but implied via cookie policy and Termly integration.
  7. No terms of service found on this page.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt detected.
  10. Company phone number and address found in structured data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Alpine.js for reactive UI components, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and Weglot for multilingual support. Hosting appears to be on Azure DNS infrastructure, indicating reliable cloud hosting. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes SEO-friendly meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine indexing. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and preloading of CSS assets. Accessibility features are basic but present, such as ARIA labels and keyboard navigation support. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with intelligentvideo.tv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review intelligentvideo.tv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.