Skip to main content

Security report for intasure.com

Intasure · Real Estate · United Kingdom

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Intasure is a UK-based specialist insurance provider focusing on holiday home, property, and caravan insurance both domestically and internationally. Established in 2004, the company positions itself as a leading expert with over 20 years of experience, serving customers in over 40 countries. Their business model revolves around providing tailored insurance products for second homes, holiday lets, and expat residents, supported by UK-based customer service and claims teams. The website reflects a professional and trustworthy brand with strong customer testimonials and partner endorsements. Technically, the site uses modern tools such as Google Tag Manager and Visual Website Optimizer, hosted likely behind Akamai DNS services, and built on WordPress. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly but lacks some advanced accessibility features and security headers. Security posture is good with HTTPS and domain transfer protection, but DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit security policies are published. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is safe, professional, and credible but could improve transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching intasure.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
75
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Intasure holds a strong market position as a specialist insurer in the holiday home and caravan insurance sector, targeting UK and overseas property owners including expats and Airbnb hosts. Their competitive advantage lies in their niche focus, extensive geographic coverage, and in-house UK support teams. Revenue streams likely include insurance premiums and commissions from partner insurers. The company maintains partnerships with platforms like Acturis and has a visible presence on Trustpilot and social media, enhancing credibility. Growth indicators include a broad product range and active content marketing through blogs and guides. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance privacy compliance and security transparency to align with evolving regulatory requirements.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain status set to clientTransferProhibited, reducing risk of unauthorized domain transfers. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options indicates room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. There is no visible incident response or security contact information, which could hinder timely reporting and handling of security incidents. GDPR compliance is not clearly demonstrated due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but would benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve DNS security.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Implement and configure security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Add explicit security and incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and update third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Intasure
Description
Intasure are the leading holiday home insurance specialists. Covering over 40 countries worldwide, our holiday home insurance covers building & contents, including chalets, lodges & caravans.
Key services
Holiday Home Insurance, Overseas Property Insurance, Caravan Insurance, Expat & EU Resident Insurance, Property Insurance, Landlord Insurance, Airbnb Insurance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), Akamai DNS, Acturis insurance platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Visual Website Optimizer
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Visual Website Optimizer
Marketing tools
Visual Website Optimizer
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured for its insurance niche
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on homepage or main navigation
  3. Strong presence of customer trust signals such as Trustpilot reviews
  4. Use of modern tracking and optimization tools like Google Tag Manager and VWO
  5. Domain registration and DNS configuration are stable but DNSSEC is not enabled
  6. No visible security headers or explicit security policies published
  7. Contact information is primarily phone and contact forms; no public email addresses found
  8. Content is focused on UK and overseas holiday home insurance products
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a custom theme and uses modern JavaScript-based tools for analytics and optimization, including Google Tag Manager and Visual Website Optimizer. Hosting appears to leverage Akamai DNS services, suggesting a robust infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO meta tags present. Accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. The site uses external links primarily to partner and social media domains, with no suspicious or malicious domains detected. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which could be addressed to improve overall security posture and resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with intasure.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review intasure.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.