Skip to main content

Security report for insituform.com

Azuria · Transportation · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Azuria, through its Insituform brand, is a well-established leader in the pipeline rehabilitation industry with over 50 years of experience. The company specializes in trenchless technology solutions such as CIPP for municipal, industrial, aviation, transportation, and defense sectors. Their market position is strong, supported by ISO certifications and a broad portfolio of services and subsidiaries. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with comprehensive content targeting B2B clients in infrastructure maintenance and renewal. Technically, the website employs modern frameworks like Vue.js and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Adobe DTM. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO and accessibility basics, though some accessibility enhancements could be made. Performance is moderate with a well-structured navigation system. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with reCAPTCHA protection on forms and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating good privacy compliance. However, it lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the website and domain demonstrate high legitimacy and trustworthiness. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security and incident response policies, and improving accessibility compliance to further strengthen the security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
75/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching insituform.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
75
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Azuria operates in the infrastructure rehabilitation market with a focus on trenchless pipeline technologies. Their competitive advantage lies in their pioneering CIPP technology and extensive experience. The business model is B2B, serving municipalities, industrial clients, and government sectors. Revenue streams likely include service contracts, product sales, and licensing of proprietary technologies. The company maintains a broad partnership and subsidiary ecosystem to cover diverse market needs. Growth indicators include ISO certifications, a comprehensive service portfolio, and active digital presence. The company’s strategic positioning as a market leader is reinforced by consistent branding and professional digital assets.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate to good. The website enforces HTTPS, uses Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate spam, and implements cookie consent for GDPR compliance. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency and preparedness. No critical vulnerabilities or security misconfigurations were observed in the HTML content. The use of multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing monitoring for supply chain risks. Enhancing security headers and publishing a security.txt file would improve the security culture and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to harden the website against common attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt page to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate supply chain vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Azuria
Description
Insituform is a leader in cured in place pipe (CIPP) solutions with over 50 years of experience, offering trenchless pipeline rehabilitation solutions for water and wastewater pipelines across multiple sectors including municipal, industrial, aviation, transportation, and defense.
Key services
CIPP rehabilitation, Potable water rehabilitation, Forcemain rehabilitation, Manhole rehabilitation, Spray-in-place pipe lining (SIPP), UV CIPP rehabilitation, Cathodic protection
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Google reCAPTCHA, Bing Ads, Adobe DTM (Dynamic Tag Management), Feather Icons, Google Fonts, Typekit Fonts
Frameworks
Vue.js
Platforms
Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent banner with explicit consent
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Kickfire
Marketing tools
Adobe DTM
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern JavaScript frameworks and tracking technologies.
  2. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  3. No exposed sensitive information or obvious security vulnerabilities detected.
  4. Comprehensive navigation with clear business and product/service information.
  5. Multiple social media channels linked for corporate presence.
  6. Use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from spam.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Vue.js framework with integration of multiple modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Adobe DTM, and Google reCAPTCHA. Fonts are loaded from Typekit and Google Fonts, ensuring consistent typography. The site uses asynchronous loading for scripts to optimize performance. The presence of a cookie consent banner and GDPR-compliant privacy policy indicates attention to regulatory requirements. The technical infrastructure appears stable and moderately performant, with room for improvement in accessibility and security header implementation. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with insituform.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review insituform.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.