Skip to main content

Security report for insiderdata360online.com

InsiderData360 · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Network security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

InsiderData360 operates a proprietary dashboard platform, likely focused on data analytics or business intelligence services. The website serves primarily as a login portal for authorized users to access the dashboard. The business appears to be a small technology company founded around 2018, with claims of proprietary technology protected by patents. The platform targets business users requiring data insights and dashboard services. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including Bootstrap, Chartist.js, Moment.js, and integrates Calendly for scheduling. The site is basic in design and functionality, optimized for desktop and mobile with minimal content beyond the login form. Security posture is moderate but lacks advanced protections such as security headers, CSRF tokens, and CAPTCHA on login forms. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating limited compliance with privacy regulations. The domain registration is consistent and stable, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 29 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching insiderdata360online.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a technology provider offering a data dashboard platform with proprietary technology and patents. The business model appears to be subscription or login-based SaaS targeting business clients needing data analytics. The lack of public marketing content or detailed service descriptions suggests a focus on existing clients or a closed user base. The presence of Calendly indicates some client engagement or support scheduling. No social media or extensive contact information is provided, limiting public visibility. The domain age and registration details align with the company's founding timeline, supporting credibility. The company operates in the technology sector with a small size profile and no visible parent or subsidiary companies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS implied but not confirmed in the HTML content. The login form uses POST and password input types but lacks CSRF tokens and CAPTCHA, increasing risk of automated attacks. No security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS are detected, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. DNSSEC is not enabled on the domain, reducing DNS security. No incident response or security policy information is published. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with recommendations to implement standard web security best practices and privacy compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to harden the website.
  3. Integrate CSRF tokens and CAPTCHA or other bot mitigation on login forms to prevent automated attacks.
  4. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  5. Establish and publish incident response and security policies including contact channels for security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
InsiderData360
Description
InsiderData360 provides a dashboard platform likely related to data analytics or business intelligence as implied by the name and login portal.
Key services
dashboard access, data analytics platform
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts, Line Awesome Icons, Chartist.js, Moment.js, Pikaday.js, Calendly Widget
Frameworks
Bootstrap (extended CSS)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Form uses POST method
  • Password input type used

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Calendly
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login portal for InsiderData360 dashboard
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on this page
  3. Contact emails are present only in footer text as references to legal and patent contacts
  4. No phone numbers or physical addresses found
  5. No social media links detected
  6. Uses modern web fonts and icon libraries
  7. Includes Calendly widget for scheduling
  8. No visible analytics or tracking scripts
  9. No security headers or advanced security controls visible
  10. Domain WHOIS data is consistent and not privacy protected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern but basic technology stack including Bootstrap for styling, Chartist.js for charts, Moment.js and Pikaday.js for date handling, and integrates Calendly for scheduling. The HTML and CSS are valid and structured but minimal, focusing on a login form. Performance is moderate with external font and icon resources loaded from Google Fonts and Icons8. Mobile optimization is basic with responsive CSS but no advanced accessibility features detected. SEO optimization is minimal with basic meta tags but no Open Graph or structured data present. Hosting provider is not explicitly identified beyond name servers. No CMS detected in the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but could be enhanced with improved accessibility, SEO, and security features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 49/100High34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with insiderdata360online.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review insiderdata360online.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.