Skip to main content

Security report for inpost.pl

InPost · Transportation · Poland

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

InPost is a well-established Polish parcel delivery and logistics company founded in 2006, specializing in automated parcel lockers (Paczkomat®) and courier services for both individual and business customers. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive service offerings, multi-language support, and clear navigation. Technically, the site is built on Drupal CMS, integrates modern tracking and consent management tools like Google Tag Manager and OneTrust, and demonstrates good performance and accessibility standards. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, appropriate security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities, although DNSSEC is not enabled and incident response contacts are not explicitly provided. Privacy compliance is robust with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the website and domain registration data indicate a trustworthy and credible business with a strong market position in the transportation sector.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of inpost.pl. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching inpost.pl

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

InPost operates primarily in the transportation sector, focusing on parcel delivery and courier logistics. Its business model leverages automated parcel lockers and courier networks to serve a broad customer base including individuals and enterprises. The company maintains partnerships with e-commerce and payment platforms, enhancing its service ecosystem. The website content and structure support a professional brand image and facilitate customer engagement through tracking, shipment services, and business solutions like fulfillment. Market positioning is strong in Poland, supported by a domain age of over 17 years and consistent WHOIS data. The company shows signs of digital maturity with integrated marketing and analytics tools, and a focus on sustainability and corporate responsibility as indicated by ESG strategy pages.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, including HSTS, CSP, and X-Frame-Options. The use of OneTrust for cookie consent indicates attention to privacy regulations such as GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security.txt file and explicit incident response contact information suggests room for improvement in vulnerability disclosure and incident management transparency. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could be considered to enhance DNS security. Overall, the site follows best practices but could benefit from formalizing its security communication channels.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  3. Add explicit incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider obtaining and displaying recognized security certifications to enhance trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
InPost
Description
InPost offers parcel locker services (Paczkomat®), courier services, and affordable courier shipments for individual customers and businesses. Services include parcel tracking, Allegro InPost offers, quick returns, pricing, and contact information.
Key services
Paczkomat® parcel lockers, Courier services, Parcel tracking, International shipments, Business fulfillment
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Drupal CMS, JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
Drupal
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure login links to external trusted domains

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Marketing tools
OneTrust
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  3. Multiple language support (Polish, English, Ukrainian).
  4. Use of modern tracking and consent technologies.
  5. Clear business and contact information provided.
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  7. Domain registration data supports business legitimacy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal CMS, leveraging modern web technologies including JavaScript, CSS, and integration with Google Tag Manager and OneTrust for analytics and consent management. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features such as skip navigation links and ARIA labels. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized images. SEO is supported by meta tags, canonical links, and multi-language hreflang attributes. Hosting provider details are not explicitly detected. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence, though enabling DNSSEC and further security hardening would strengthen the overall technical posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 77/100Low26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with inpost.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inpost.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.