Skip to main content

Security report for inovura.cz

inovura s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

inovura s.r.o. is a Czech-based small technology company specializing in voice-controlled smart home systems tailored for physically handicapped users. Their business model focuses on modular, customizable home automation solutions that enhance accessibility and independence. The company collaborates closely with the SILOU HLASU association to provide user training and extend their service reach. The website reflects a professional and focused approach with clear business information and media references, positioning inovura as a niche player in assistive technology within the Czech market. Technically, the website employs modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap and jQuery, with mobile responsiveness and a cookie consent mechanism implemented. However, there is no evidence of a CMS or advanced hosting details. Performance is moderate, and SEO and accessibility features are basic but adequate for the site’s scope. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS (assumed from external Google scripts and reCAPTCHA), includes Google reCAPTCHA on the contact form, and has a cookie consent banner, indicating some privacy awareness. However, the absence of security headers and a privacy policy page are notable gaps. The WHOIS data is missing, which reduces domain trust and raises questions about registration transparency. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from improved security practices, privacy compliance, and WHOIS transparency to enhance trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching inovura.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in a specialized segment of the smart home technology market, focusing on assistive solutions for disabled users. Their partnership with SILOU HLASU strengthens their market position by combining technology with user training. The business model likely relies on direct sales and custom installations, supported by software (MyVoice) and modular hardware components. Media coverage and video content indicate active marketing efforts. The company targets a niche but socially impactful market segment, which may limit scale but enhances differentiation. Growth potential exists through partnerships and expanding modular offerings. The lack of visible certifications or security policies may impact enterprise or institutional customer confidence.

Security posture

The security posture is moderate but incomplete. The use of HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA are positive controls. However, the lack of visible security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options weakens defense-in-depth. The missing privacy policy and incident response contacts indicate compliance gaps, especially under GDPR. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency and trust. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found in the content. Overall, the site is functional but should improve security hardening and compliance documentation to reduce risk and enhance user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with strong TLS configuration and redirect all HTTP traffic.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the homepage.
  4. Provide clear security incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  5. Investigate and resolve WHOIS data unavailability to improve domain transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
inovura s.r.o.
VAT number
CZ08885320
Registration number
08885320
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
inovura s.r.o.
Description
inovura s.r.o. is a company specializing in designing and customizing voice-controlled home automation systems, particularly aimed at assisting physically handicapped users. They collaborate with the SILOU HLASU association to develop modular, secure, and tailored smart home solutions that enable voice control of household devices.
Key services
Voice-controlled home automation system design and implementation, Modular smart home hardware integration, Software application MyVoice for voice command processing, Collaboration with SILOU HLASU for voice control training
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5, jQuery 3.3.1, Google reCAPTCHA v2, Bootstrap Icons, FreePrivacyPolicy.com cookie consent script
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web (desktop and mobile browsers)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on contact form to prevent spam
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. Website uses modern frontend technologies and includes cookie consent.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, address, and contact form with CAPTCHA.
  5. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  6. No explicit security headers detected; security posture can be improved.
  7. Website content is focused on assistive voice-controlled smart home technology.
  8. Media references and partner association add credibility.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard Bootstrap framework with jQuery and Bootstrap Icons for UI components, ensuring responsive design and moderate performance. Google reCAPTCHA integration protects the contact form from spam. The cookie consent banner complies with basic privacy requirements. No CMS or backend technologies are evident from the HTML. External dependencies include CDN-hosted libraries and media hosted on partner domains. The site lacks advanced SEO metadata and accessibility features but maintains a clear navigation structure. Hosting provider and SSL certificate details are not available, limiting deeper technical assessment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with inovura.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inovura.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.