Innsamlingskontrollen i Norge · Non-profit · Norway
Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.
Innsamlingskontrollen i Norge is a Norwegian non-profit organization dedicated to ensuring that fundraising activities are conducted responsibly and that donated funds reach their intended purposes. The website serves as a resource for donors and approved fundraising organizations, providing certification, ethical guidelines, and lists of approved and suspicious organizations. The organization maintains a trusted position within the Norwegian fundraising sector, supported by clear contact information and active social media presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and employs a mix of JavaScript libraries including jQuery, Vue.js, and Chart.js, alongside Google Tag Manager for analytics and CookiePro for consent management. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and content quality, although some technologies like Vue.js are outdated, which could pose security risks. The website uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent, but lacks comprehensive privacy and security policies. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS and basic privacy compliance mechanisms but lacks advanced security headers and incident response information. The absence of a privacy policy and security headers, along with outdated libraries, represent moderate security concerns. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain ownership transparency, but the website's professional presentation and contact details support its legitimacy. Overall, the website is functional, trustworthy, and serves its non-profit mission well, but improvements in privacy policy publication, security headers, and technology updates are recommended to enhance security posture and compliance.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, Cloudflare
What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention innsamlingskontrollen.no, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for innsamlingskontrollen.no right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Domains that imitate innsamlingskontrollen.no and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.
Last checked 2026-06-20
See the full lookalike list
A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of innsamlingskontrollen.no with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.
Select it in the checkout above.
Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with innsamlingskontrollen.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review innsamlingskontrollen.no.