Skip to main content

Security report for innovatrics.com

Innovatrics · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Innovatrics is an established biometric technology provider specializing in solutions for government and enterprise sectors. Founded in 2004, the company claims to have helped over 1 billion people across more than 80 countries, indicating a strong global presence and market position. Their website reflects a professional and business-focused approach, targeting large organizations requiring biometric solutions. The company leverages modern web technologies including WordPress CMS, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy compliance. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security measures such as HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA are implemented, alongside a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, demonstrating attention to user privacy and security. However, the absence of explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages, as well as missing WHOIS registration data, present areas for improvement in transparency and trust. Overall, the website is professional and secure but would benefit from enhanced compliance documentation and verified domain registration details.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching innovatrics.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
65
Email security
95
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
95
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Innovatrics operates in the technology sector with a focus on biometric solutions, serving government and enterprise clients worldwide. Their business model centers on providing advanced biometric software and systems, positioning themselves as a trusted independent provider. The company’s market positioning is strong, supported by claims of extensive deployment and a broad customer base. Their digital presence includes active social media channels on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and YouTube, which supports brand visibility and customer engagement. The website’s content and structure suggest a medium-sized enterprise with a focus on innovation and compliance. The lack of direct contact information and detailed corporate data on the website limits deeper business intelligence insights. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not explicitly identified in the content provided.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and the use of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate bot traffic. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, ensuring compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security hardening. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content analyzed. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact information is a gap in security transparency and readiness. The missing WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which should be addressed to improve trust. Overall, the security posture is good but can be enhanced by implementing additional headers, publishing security policies, and verifying domain registration.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages prominently on the website.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and trustworthiness.
  4. Add explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  5. Consider publishing a security policy and incident response contact details to improve security posture and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Innovatrics
Description
We are an independent provider of leading biometric technology since 2004. Our biometric solutions helped 1 billion people in 80+ countries.
Key services
Biometric technology solutions, Biometric software and systems
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Bing tracking, Cookiebot, Google reCAPTCHA, Clarity (Microsoft), Factors.ai
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Bing Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Google AdSense
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Bing, LinkedIn, Twitter, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Factors.ai, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected.
  2. Strong cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms implemented.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in provided content.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the analyzed content.
  5. Website uses multiple tracking and analytics services with extensive user tracking.
  6. WHOIS data missing or domain not found, which is unusual for an established business website.
  7. Website content is professional and focused on biometric technology solutions.
  8. Social media links are present and consistent with company branding.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS and uses a modern technology stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy management. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile-optimized, providing a good user experience. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format, enhancing search engine visibility. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site uses multiple external scripts for tracking and marketing, which increases user tracking but is managed with consent mechanisms. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and compliance documentation are recommended to reduce risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with innovatrics.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review innovatrics.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.