Skip to main content

Security report for innotrans.com

InnoTrans · Transportation · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

InnoTrans is a prominent international trade fair specializing in transport technology, offering a comprehensive platform for industry professionals, exhibitors, and visitors. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on modern technologies such as React and Next.js, with a content management system likely powered by Episerver. The site provides extensive information about the event, including exhibitor directories, programs, and press releases, although explicit privacy and terms of service pages are not detected in the provided content. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent via Usercentrics, but lack of visible security headers and incident response contacts suggest room for improvement. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, serving a large audience in the transportation sector primarily in Germany.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching innotrans.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention innotrans.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
19
Employees
0
Customers
19
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for innotrans.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a large-scale trade fair organizer in the transportation industry, targeting industry stakeholders globally. Its market position is strong as a leading event in transport technology, leveraging partnerships and a broad exhibitor base. The business model centers on event organization, exhibitor services, and visitor engagement. The website's content and structure support these objectives, although direct contact information and legal policies are not prominently available, which could impact user trust and compliance. The ecosystem includes related domains for media and event management, indicating a well-integrated digital strategy.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, the absence of explicit security headers, vulnerability disclosure policies, and incident response contacts limits its security maturity. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Compliance with GDPR is partially indicated through cookie consent but lacks a formal privacy policy. Enhancing security headers, publishing incident response information, and formalizing privacy documentation would strengthen the security framework and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the main navigation or footer.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general inquiries and security incidents.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain compliance and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
InnoTrans
Description
InnoTrans is an International Trade Fair for Transport Technology providing a platform for domestic and international supply and demand in the transport technology sector.
Key services
Trade fair organization, Exhibitor services, Visitor information, Event programs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Next.js), Usercentrics (cookie consent), Web fonts (woff2), JavaScript ES modules
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL https://)
  • Cookie consent implemented via Usercentrics

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Usercentrics
Marketing tools
Usercentrics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional trade fair platform for transport technology.
  2. Content is comprehensive with multiple sections about the event, exhibitors, programs, and press.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  4. Cookie consent implemented via Usercentrics script.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  7. No security headers data available; recommend adding standard headers.
  8. Website uses modern React/Next.js framework and web fonts.
  9. No WAF or blocking detected; content fully accessible.
  10. WHOIS data limited; domain uses managed IP name servers.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React/Next.js framework with server-side rendering capabilities, ensuring good performance and SEO optimization. It uses web fonts and asynchronous JavaScript loading to improve user experience. Hosting is managed via Managed IP name servers, indicating professional infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized and includes cookie consent via Usercentrics. However, the lack of visible security headers and limited metadata on SSL configuration suggest potential technical debt in security hardening. The content management system appears to be Episerver, supporting structured content delivery. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with innotrans.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review innotrans.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.