Skip to main content

Security report for inno.nl

inno.dev · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

inno.dev is a small technology service provider specializing in website and app development. The company targets businesses and startups seeking custom software solutions. The website is built using modern JavaScript technologies including React and Gatsby, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the site lacks comprehensive SEO metadata, structured data, and visible contact information, which limits its business credibility and user engagement potential. Security posture is weak due to absence of visible HTTPS confirmation, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms. No incident response or security policies are published, which may impact trust and compliance. Overall, the website is functional but requires improvements in security, privacy compliance, and business transparency to enhance trustworthiness and professional standing.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching inno.nl

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector focusing on software development services. Its business model is service-oriented, delivering custom website and app development. Market positioning appears niche with no visible partnerships or certifications. The absence of contact details and business registration information limits transparency. The website content is basic and lacks advanced marketing or analytics tools, suggesting a lean operational approach. Growth potential may be constrained by limited online presence and lack of trust signals. No related or partner domains were identified, indicating a standalone operation.

Security posture

The security maturity level is low based on the available data. No HTTPS status was confirmed, and no security headers were detected. The absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates limited security governance. No forms or input fields were found, reducing attack surface but also limiting user interaction. GDPR compliance is partial with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. The site does not demonstrate adherence to recognized security frameworks or certifications. Recommendations include implementing HTTPS, adding security headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and verify configuration
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security
  3. Publish a comprehensive cookie policy and implement a consent mechanism to comply with GDPR
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security inquiries
  5. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response plan to improve trust and compliance
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
inno.dev
Description
Website and app development services
Key services
Website development, App development
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, React, Gatsby
Frameworks
Gatsby
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses Gatsby framework with React and JavaScript
  2. No visible contact information or forms on the homepage HTML content
  3. Privacy policy page exists but cookie policy and terms of service are missing
  4. No security headers detected in provided data
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected except a script from p.inno.nl domain
  6. No social media links or emails found in the HTML content
  7. No forms or input fields detected in the provided HTML
  8. Minimal SEO metadata present, no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data found
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Gatsby, a React-based static site generator, indicating a modern front-end technology stack. Scripts are loaded asynchronously to improve performance. However, the site lacks visible CMS integration or advanced analytics tools. Performance is moderate with preloading of scripts but no explicit performance metrics available. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no ARIA or accessibility tags detected. SEO optimization is minimal with only basic meta tags and no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider is not identified from the data. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist in SEO, accessibility, and security implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with inno.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inno.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.