Skip to main content

Security report for innlandstrafikk.no

Innlandstrafikk · Transportation · Norway

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Innlandstrafikk is a regional public transportation service provider for Innlandet county in Norway, offering bus schedules, travel planning, ticketing information, and customer support. The website serves residents and travelers in the region, providing essential transit information and services. The business is positioned as a key regional transport authority, supported by the Innlandet County Municipality. The site is professionally designed with consistent branding and clear navigation, targeting a general audience with a focus on public transport users. Technically, the website employs a mix of legacy and modern web technologies including jQuery, JavaScript ES6 modules, and third-party services such as Google Translate and Siteimprove analytics. It is built on the Acos CMS platform and demonstrates good mobile optimization and accessibility features. Performance is moderate with room for improvement, especially by updating outdated libraries. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and anti-CSRF tokens, but lacks visible security headers and uses an outdated jQuery version that may expose it to vulnerabilities. There is no explicit security policy or vulnerability disclosure mechanism published. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but could benefit from technical and security enhancements to improve compliance and reduce risk. Strategic recommendations include updating JavaScript libraries, implementing security headers, and adding cookie consent mechanisms to align with GDPR requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching innlandstrafikk.no

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Innlandstrafikk operates as a public transportation authority focused on Innlandet county, Norway. Its competitive advantage lies in its official status and integration with regional government services. The business model centers on providing transit information and facilitating ticket sales, likely funded through public budgets and ticket revenues. The target customers are local residents, commuters, and visitors requiring reliable transit data. The company maintains partnerships with travel planning services like Entur and the county municipality website, enhancing its service ecosystem. Growth indicators include active news updates and customer engagement channels such as chat and social media. The website reflects a stable regional presence with moderate digital maturity.

Security posture

The security posture of Innlandstrafikk's website is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and anti-CSRF tokens are used in forms, indicating awareness of basic web security practices. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version introduces potential vulnerabilities. The absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. No published security policy or incident response contact channels were found, which may hinder coordinated vulnerability management. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but lacking cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is functional and reasonably secure but requires improvements to meet higher security and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to current supported versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  4. Publish a security policy and vulnerability disclosure page, including a security.txt file, to improve incident response readiness.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and overall website infrastructure to identify and remediate risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Innlandstrafikk
Description
Provides bus schedules, travel planner, and ticket information for public transport in Innlandet county, Norway.
Key services
Bus schedules, Travel planning, Ticket sales and information, School transport, Customer service
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, JavaScript ES6 modules, Google Translate widget, Siteimprove analytics, Lightbox, EventBus, Vanilla JS autosuggest
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Anti-CSRF token used in form submission
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security tokens in API calls

Analytics and tracking

Services
Siteimprove analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Siteimprove analytics
Marketing tools
Google Translate
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Norwegian (nb) and targeted at Innlandet county residents.
  3. The site uses HTTPS and modern web technologies but includes an outdated jQuery version.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with phone and email.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and links to official county website.
  6. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banner detected, which may be a compliance gap.
  7. No visible terms of service or security policy pages.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. The site integrates third-party analytics and translation services.
  10. Good accessibility and SEO practices observed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Acos CMS and uses a combination of legacy jQuery (v1.12.4) and modern JavaScript ES6 modules. It integrates third-party services such as Google Translate and Siteimprove analytics. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with potential bottlenecks from legacy scripts. The technical stack is stable but would benefit from modernization, especially updating outdated libraries and enhancing security configurations. Hosting details are not explicitly identified, but the site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but has room for improvement in security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with innlandstrafikk.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review innlandstrafikk.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.