Skip to main content

Security report for inmaatfoundation.org

InMaat Foundation · Non-profit · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

InMaat Foundation is a small non-profit organization founded in 2014, dedicated to supporting organizations that challenge systemic gender oppression and promote justice and human rights. The website reflects a focused mission with relevant content aimed at social justice advocates and organizations. The foundation maintains a consistent brand presence and offers storytelling and inspirational content to engage its audience. Technically, the website is built on a modern stack likely using Craft CMS, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS, and employs Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile optimized with good SEO practices but lacks some accessibility features and cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, which could be improved. Overall, the domain registration is consistent with the organization's history and mission, indicating legitimacy. The site is safe for general audiences with no adult or questionable content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching inmaatfoundation.org

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The InMaat Foundation operates in the non-profit sector focusing on gender justice and human rights. Its business model centers on supporting aligned organizations rather than direct commercial services. The foundation leverages digital storytelling and social media to build community and awareness. Market positioning is niche but credible, supported by a stable domain and consistent branding. The foundation's partnerships include social media platforms and email marketing via Mailchimp. Growth indicators include recent news updates and active social media presence. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled communication channels via forms. The organization could benefit from enhanced transparency in security and privacy policies to strengthen trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security represents potential areas of improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The site lacks published incident response or security policies, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. Cookie consent mechanisms are missing, which may impact GDPR compliance. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit but could be enhanced to align with best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to increase transparency and preparedness.
  4. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy controls.
  5. Consider adding direct verified contact emails or phone numbers to improve communication trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
InMaat Foundation
Description
We support organizations that ​​challenge and disrupt systemic gender oppression while championing justice and human rights.
Key services
Supporting organizations challenging systemic gender oppression, Championing justice and human rights, Storytelling and inspiration content
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Mailchimp (email subscription form)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to non-profit social justice mission
  3. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via form only
  4. No cookie consent mechanism present despite GDPR relevance
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  6. Use of modern web fonts and Google Tag Manager for analytics
  7. Domain registration is stable and consistent with business claims
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with JavaScript, Google Fonts, and Google Tag Manager integrated. The CMS is likely Craft CMS, inferred from CSRF token naming conventions and script paths. Hosting is managed via Cloudflare DNS services, providing reliable DNS resolution and some security benefits. Performance is moderate with deferred JavaScript loading and mobile optimization present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA attributes and better semantic markup. No critical technical debt or vulnerabilities were detected, but the absence of DNSSEC and security headers represents a technical risk that should be addressed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with inmaatfoundation.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inmaatfoundation.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.