Skip to main content

Security report for inim.biz

Inim Electronics · Technology · Italy

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Inim Electronics is an Italian company specializing in advanced security and safety electronic systems, including intrusion detection, fire safety, emergency lighting, and home automation solutions. The company targets both public and private sectors, offering innovative cloud-based management platforms to enhance remote monitoring and maintenance. Their market position is that of an established technology provider with a focus on innovation and comprehensive protection solutions. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and provides clear navigation to product categories and partner information. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks like Bootstrap and integrates third-party services such as Vimeo and Cookiebot for video and consent management. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers are missing and no explicit incident response contacts are provided. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust assessment but the overall digital presence and compliance with privacy regulations support legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing explicit security policies, and improving direct contact availability to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching inim.biz

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Inim Electronics operates in the technology sector with a focus on security and safety solutions. Their business model revolves around manufacturing and distributing electronic systems for intrusion detection, fire safety, and emergency lighting, complemented by cloud-based remote management services. The company targets a broad audience including private individuals and institutional clients. Their competitive advantage lies in integrating advanced technology with user-friendly automation and cloud services. The partnership ecosystem includes distributors, certified installers, and designers, indicating a well-structured channel strategy. Growth indicators include active promotional campaigns and a strong social media presence. The company maintains professional content and branding consistency, reinforcing market credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism in place, indicating GDPR compliance efforts. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of explicit security or incident response policies suggest room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The company does not publicly disclose incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policies, which could impact responsiveness to security incidents. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but would benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  4. Provide clear and direct company contact information including verified emails and phone numbers on the website to improve trust and customer engagement.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Inim Electronics
Description
Inim Electronics provides advanced security and safety technology solutions including intrusion detection, home automation, fire detection, and emergency lighting systems. Their products target both public and private structures, focusing on protection, comfort, and safety.
Key services
Security & Comfort systems, Fire & Safety systems, Emergency lighting, Cloud-based remote management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.3.2, jQuery 3.7.1, Vimeo embedded video, Cookiebot consent management
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Italian with multi-language options.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page; contact likely via dedicated pages.
  4. Social media presence is strong with official company accounts.
  5. No forms detected on the main page; data collection likely via other pages.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  7. WHOIS data is missing, limiting domain registration trust analysis.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including Bootstrap 5.3.2 and jQuery 3.7.1, ensuring responsive design and compatibility across devices. Integration of Cookiebot for consent management and Vimeo for video content indicates a mature approach to user experience and privacy compliance. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, though optimization opportunities exist in SEO and accessibility. The absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or static site architecture. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could be enhanced with improved security headers and SEO practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with inim.biz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inim.biz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.