Skip to main content

Security report for inigo.com

Inigo · Real Estate · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Inigo is a specialized UK-based estate agency focusing on the sale and marketing of historic and architecturally significant homes. The company targets discerning buyers and sellers interested in authentic British homes with rich stories and heritage. Their market position is niche but well-defined, supported by professional branding and trust indicators such as accreditation by The Property Ombudsman and Trading Standards. The website offers comprehensive property listings, editorial content, and customer engagement tools such as newsletters and property alerts. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks including Next.js and React, with integrations for analytics (Google Analytics) and marketing automation (Klaviyo). The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO and accessibility practices, though some improvements in security headers and incident response transparency are recommended. The SSL configuration is excellent, ensuring secure communications. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and provides cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration transparency and trustworthiness. No security.txt or incident response information is published, which could be improved to enhance security posture and customer trust. Overall, Inigo presents a professional and trustworthy online presence for its real estate business, but domain registration opacity and minor security best practice gaps suggest areas for improvement. Strategic recommendations include verifying domain registration details, implementing security headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing incident response readiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching inigo.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Inigo operates in the UK real estate sector with a focus on historic homes, differentiating itself through curated listings and storytelling content. Its business model revolves around property sales commissions and marketing services. The company leverages partnerships, notably with The Modern House, to extend market reach. The target customer segment includes affluent buyers and sellers valuing heritage properties. Growth indicators include active property listings and editorial content updates. The company maintains a professional digital presence but lacks publicly visible corporate registration details, which could impact credibility. The partnership ecosystem and trust certifications support market positioning.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of a security.txt file limit transparency and incident response readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a notable risk factor, potentially indicating privacy protection or registration issues. The site would benefit from publishing explicit security policies and incident response contacts to improve security culture and customer confidence.

Recommendations

  1. Verify and publish domain registration details to improve trust and transparency.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file detailing vulnerability disclosure and incident response procedures.
  4. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits of third-party libraries.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to reflect evolving regulations and best practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Inigo
Description
Inigo is an estate agency for Britain’s historic homes. We represent and celebrate buildings that have stories to tell, whether you are looking to buy, sell or be inspired.
Key services
Property sales, Property appraisals, Newsletter and property alerts, Content and stories about historic homes
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google Analytics, Klaviyo, Typekit Fonts
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Klaviyo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Klaviyo
Marketing tools
Klaviyo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content rich focused on historic UK homes
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and warrants further domain verification
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with verified company email and phone
  5. No security.txt or incident response info found
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content
  8. No WAF or blocking detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Next.js and React, indicating a modern and scalable front-end architecture. It uses Typekit for fonts and integrates marketing and analytics tools such as Klaviyo and Google Analytics. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for SEO with comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and preloading of fonts and images. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless CMS approach. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Technical risks include missing security headers and potential domain registration opacity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with inigo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inigo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.