Skip to main content

Security report for ingenieurbuero-mbi.de

Sachverständigenbüro Müller Bauphysik Ingenieurbüro · Real Estate · Germany

Partial score · DNS & email only

50/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents a small German engineering consultancy specializing in building physics, damage assessment, and related services for private clients, insurers, and courts. The business offers expert reports, simulations, and consulting in areas such as thermal protection, moisture protection, and building acoustics. The site is hosted on the Strato platform using the cm4all CMS and employs legacy JavaScript libraries. While the content is relevant and professionally presented, the technical infrastructure is outdated and lacks modern security features. Critically, the site does not support HTTPS, exposing visitors to security risks and undermining trust. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, but privacy compliance could be improved. Overall, the business appears legitimate and consistent with its domain registration data, but the website requires urgent security upgrades to meet modern standards.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ingenieurbuero-mbi.de

This scan found 4 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
100
Average
50

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in a niche segment of the real estate and construction industry, providing specialized consulting and expert reports. Its target customers include builders, property owners, insurers, and legal entities. The business model is service-based, relying on expert knowledge and technical assessments. The website's limited size and content reflect a small-scale operation focused on local clientele. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The company leverages a hosted CMS solution, indicating moderate digital maturity but limited investment in custom infrastructure. Growth potential may be constrained by the lack of advanced digital marketing or e-commerce capabilities.

Security posture

The security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols, lack of security headers, and missing DNS security features. The site uses HttpOnly and SameSite cookie flags, which is positive, but overall security best practices are not fully implemented. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, and no security certifications are visible. The lack of SSL/TLS is a critical vulnerability that exposes users to data interception and undermines compliance with data protection regulations. The cookie consent mechanism is present but the privacy policy is basic and not clearly GDPR compliant. Immediate remediation is required to secure the website and protect user data.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce HTTPS site-wide.
  2. Enable HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Configure DNSSEC and CAA records to enhance domain security.
  4. Update JavaScript libraries to current versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR compliance and data protection.
  6. Add clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure contacts.
  7. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility features.
  8. Consider professional website redesign to improve user experience and trust.
Technical notes

Notes

The website runs on Apache 2.4.63 with PHP 8.2.28 and uses the cm4all CMS platform hosted by Strato. It includes legacy JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.7 and Prototype 1.7.3, which may pose security risks. The site loads multiple CSS and JS resources from strato-editor.com domains. Performance metrics indicate zero load time and resource count, likely due to incomplete measurement or caching. The site lacks HTTPS support and modern TLS protocols, which is a major technical deficiency. Mobile optimization is basic with some responsive CSS, but accessibility features are minimal. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data present but no structured data or JSON-LD. Overall, the technical stack is functional but outdated and insecure, requiring modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ingenieurbuero-mbi.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ingenieurbuero-mbi.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.