Skip to main content

Security report for infobus.eu

Infobus · Transportation · Ukraine

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Infobus is a professional online platform specializing in the booking of bus, train, and flight tickets across multiple countries. The company targets travelers seeking convenient and fast ticket purchasing options, supported by mobile applications on Android and iOS with strong user ratings. The website is multilingual, catering to a broad international audience, and provides extensive customer service contact options. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Bootstrap, Firebase, and Google Tag Manager, ensuring a responsive and user-friendly experience. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms but lacks explicit security policies or incident response information, which could be improved. Overall, the platform demonstrates a solid business presence with good technical implementation and moderate privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching infobus.eu

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
35
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention infobus.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
800
Employees
0
Customers
750
Third parties
50
Weak passwords
0%

7 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for infobus.eu.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate infobus.eu and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
3
Registered
3
Resolving
3
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-06-20

Masked preview

  • in•••••.euMediumbitsquatting
  • in•••••.euMediumreplacement
  • in•••.obus.euLowsubdomain

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of infobus.eu with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Infobus operates in the transportation sector, providing an essential service of ticket booking for buses, trains, and flights. Its business model revolves around online ticket sales, supported by mobile apps and a multilingual website to capture a wide market. The company maintains a strong market position with a consistent brand and trust signals such as customer service contacts and social media presence. Revenue streams likely include commissions from ticket sales and partnerships with transportation providers. The absence of detailed privacy and security policies suggests room for maturity in compliance and governance. The partnership ecosystem includes social media platforms and analytics providers, but no direct partner or subsidiary domains were identified.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented via Cookiebot. However, it lacks visible security headers and does not provide public security policies or incident response contacts, which are important for transparency and trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The use of modern frameworks and analytics tools is balanced by the absence of vulnerability disclosure mechanisms or security.txt files. Enhancing security headers and publishing clear security policies would strengthen the security posture and compliance with regulations such as GDPR and NIS2.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service on the website.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to improve security posture.
  3. Publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain compliance and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Infobus
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Infobus
Description
Book bus, train, and plane tickets easily on INFOBUS. Compare prices, choose routes, and enjoy secure, fast online booking with our app.
Key services
Bus ticket booking, Train ticket booking, Flight ticket booking, Mobile app ticketing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Bootstrap 5.3.3, Google Tag Manager, Firebase, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web, Android app, iOS app
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent via Cookiebot
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Customer.io, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Customer.io, Telegram pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional online ticket booking platform for bus, train, and flights
  2. Multi-language support with hreflang tags for many languages
  3. Mobile apps available on Android and iOS with good ratings
  4. Uses modern web technologies and analytics tools
  5. No privacy policy or terms of service explicitly found in provided content
  6. Cookie consent implemented via Cookiebot
  7. Contact phone numbers and physical address provided in structured data
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response info found
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Bootstrap 5.3.3 for responsive design, Firebase for backend services, and Google Tag Manager for analytics management. It supports multiple platforms including web, Android, and iOS apps, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. However, the absence of a CMS or explicit hosting provider details limits deeper infrastructure insights. The site could benefit from improved accessibility and performance optimizations. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals effectively but has opportunities for modernization and enhanced security integration.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with infobus.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review infobus.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.