Skip to main content

Security report for inexcz.cz

Aseta Group s.r.o. · Real Estate · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Aseta Group s.r.o. is a well-established facility management company operating in the Czech Republic with over 30 years of experience. The company offers a broad range of services including technical building management, cleaning, waste management, outdoor maintenance, substitute fulfillment, and security services. Their market position is strong, supported by a large workforce and numerous active contracts, indicating a significant presence in the facility management sector. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting businesses and institutions requiring comprehensive facility services. Technically, the website uses modern technologies such as jQuery, Tailwind CSS, and Google Analytics, with a custom or Nette-based CMS. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks visible security headers and explicit security policies. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable gap, reducing trustworthiness and requiring further verification. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could improve transparency in domain registration and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching inexcz.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention inexcz.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for inexcz.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in multiple sectors including real estate, government, energy, transportation, and other facility-related industries. Their business model focuses on providing facility management services to a wide range of clients across the Czech Republic, leveraging a large employee base and extensive experience. Revenue indicators such as a reported turnover of 1.1 billion CZK in 2024 and over 800 active contracts demonstrate strong market traction. The company maintains a visible partnership ecosystem through social media and a helpdesk domain, indicating operational maturity. Strategic observations suggest a focus on sustainability, digitalization, and ethical business practices, which align with modern corporate responsibility trends. The company’s growth and market position appear stable, with opportunities to enhance trust through improved domain transparency and security communication.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, reflecting compliance with privacy regulations like GDPR. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a dedicated security policy or incident response contact information limits transparency and preparedness perception. The missing WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a corporate website but would benefit from enhanced header configurations and explicit security disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Verify and publish domain registration details to improve trust and transparency, addressing the missing WHOIS data issue.
  3. Add a dedicated security policy page and incident response contact information to enhance security culture and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure they do not introduce vulnerabilities or privacy risks.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to reflect evolving regulations and best practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aseta Group s.r.o.
Description
Facility management company with 30 years of experience providing services such as technical building management, cleaning, waste management, outdoor maintenance, substitute fulfillment, and security services across the Czech Republic.
Key services
Technická správa budov, Úklidové a čisticí práce, Odpadové hospodářství, Údržba venkovních ploch, Náhradní plnění, Strážní služba
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Tailwind CSS
Frameworks
Nette Framework (implied by JS nette extensions)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. Strong focus on facility management services in Czech Republic.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and comprehensive.
  4. No visible security policy or incident response contact information.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
  6. Social media presence on LinkedIn and YouTube supports legitimacy.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern tech stack including jQuery, Tailwind CSS, and Google Analytics, with evidence of the Nette PHP framework. The site is mobile-optimized and features multimedia content such as videos and sliders, contributing to a good user experience. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts and CDN usage for some resources. The CMS appears custom or framework-based rather than a common platform like WordPress. Technical debt is minimal from the visible code, but the lack of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent risks. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility features and enhance SEO through richer metadata and structured data implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with inexcz.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inexcz.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.