Skip to main content

Security report for inetis.ch

inetis SA · Technology · Switzerland

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

inetis SA is a Swiss digital agency specializing in bespoke digital transformation projects and custom web application development, primarily serving institutions, associations, and SMEs. The company has a strong regional presence and a well-established reputation since 2006. Their service offerings include website creation, digital annual reports, accessibility solutions, business applications, and UX/UI design. The website reflects a professional and user-centric approach with excellent content quality and navigation. Technically, the site leverages modern technologies such as Laravel and OctoberCMS, hosted likely on infomaniak infrastructure with integrations including AWS and Stripe. The website is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers and explicit security policies are absent. Privacy compliance is a notable gap, with no visible privacy or cookie policies or consent mechanisms, which could pose regulatory risks under GDPR. Contact information is clearly presented, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and well-maintained, but would benefit from improved privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching inetis.ch

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

inetis SA operates in the technology sector with a focus on digital services for non-profit and institutional clients in Switzerland. Their business model is service-oriented, delivering custom digital solutions tailored to client needs. The company benefits from a stable client base including government and social organizations, supported by strong testimonials and partnerships. Their competitive advantage lies in their user-centric design philosophy and technical expertise in modern web frameworks. Growth indicators include a diverse portfolio of recent projects and active social media presence. Strategic partnerships with technology providers and regional institutions strengthen their market position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate room for improvement. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present, limiting transparency. The minimal use of tracking scripts suggests a privacy-conscious approach, but the lack of cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies is a compliance gap. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and improving header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to obtain user consent for tracking.
  3. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  4. Create and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
inetis SA
Registration number
CHE-113.322.040
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
inetis SA
Description
inetis is a digital agency specializing in digital transformation projects and custom web application development, focusing primarily on user-centric solutions for institutions, associations, and SMEs.
Key services
Websites, Digital annual reports, Accessibility for disabled persons, Business applications, Client/member portals, Social-professional insertion software, Visual identities, User experience and interface design (UX/UI), Printed materials
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Laravel, OctoberCMS, Amazon AWS, Stripe, Bexio, curaLINE, infomaniak
Frameworks
Laravel, OctoberCMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries
  • Secure forms (contact form linked but not embedded in HTML)

Analytics and tracking

Services
1pilot.io
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
1pilot.io
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible and professionally designed.
  2. Content is rich, relevant, and well-structured.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  5. Contact information is clearly presented and consistent.
  6. Use of modern technologies and CMS (OctoberCMS, Laravel).
  7. Strong focus on accessibility and user experience.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram.
  9. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
  10. No advertising networks detected except minimal tracking by 1pilot.io.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Laravel and OctoberCMS, supported by cloud services such as AWS and payment integration via Stripe. The site is well-structured with valid HTML and CSS, optimized for mobile devices and accessibility. Performance is moderate, with no major technical debt visible. The use of reputable hosting and technology partners reduces operational risks. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and formalize privacy and security documentation to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with inetis.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inetis.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.