Skip to main content

Security report for industrypartners.com

Industry Partners · Real Estate · United States

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Industry Partners is a specialized real estate services firm founded in 2002, focusing on landlord, tenant, and developer representation with an emphasis on creative work environments and adaptive reuse projects in Los Angeles. The company maintains a professional online presence with a well-structured website built on WordPress, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The website content is relevant and targeted towards real estate clients in the LA area, showcasing listings, case studies, and neighborhood insights. From a technical perspective, the site is moderately performant and mobile-optimized, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is implied, but DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are absent. Privacy compliance is lacking, with no visible privacy or cookie policies or consent mechanisms. Business credibility is supported by consistent domain registration data, social media presence, and professional content. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching industrypartners.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention industrypartners.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for industrypartners.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the niche real estate sector, targeting landlords, tenants, and developers interested in creative and adaptive reuse properties in Los Angeles. Its business model centers on brokerage and representation services, supported by detailed case studies and property listings. The firm appears small in size but well-established, with a domain age of over 20 years. Social media channels and structured data usage indicate a focus on digital marketing and SEO. The absence of privacy policies and security disclosures suggests an area for compliance improvement. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. The domain is secured with clientTransferProhibited status, but DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended best practice. The site uses HTTPS for external resources and analytics but lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting transparency and readiness. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but requires enhancements to meet modern standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and integrity.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR and privacy compliance.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  4. Provide explicit incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses) to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to avoid vulnerabilities and improve performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Industry Partners
Description
An entrepreneurial real estate services firm specializing in the representation of landlords, tenants, and developers, with a particular focus on creative work environments, retail and adaptive reuse projects in Los Angeles.
Key services
Landlord representation, Tenant representation, Developer representation, Real estate listings, Case studies and project consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Owl Carousel, Blueimp Gallery, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by https URLs)
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status to prevent unauthorized transfers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich with clear business focus
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap
  3. No explicit security or incident response policies or contacts found
  4. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and WordPress CMS
  5. Social media presence is active and linked
  6. Domain registration is stable and consistent with business claims
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern front-end stack including jQuery, Owl Carousel, and Blueimp Gallery for interactive content. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking. The site loads multiple external font resources and scripts, which may impact performance but are standard for modern websites. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements and conditional CSS for older browsers. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. Hosting and DNS are managed via Network Solutions and NetSonicCloud name servers. No advanced frameworks beyond WordPress were detected. Performance is moderate, with opportunities for optimization in script loading and caching.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with industrypartners.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review industrypartners.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.