Skip to main content

Security report for incsub.com

Incsub · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Incsub is a well-established technology company specializing in WordPress-related products and services. Founded in 2007, it operates several leading WordPress companies including WPMU DEV, CampusPress, and Edublogs, targeting WordPress users, educational institutions, and developers. The company offers hosting, performance optimization, multisite plugins, and security services, positioning itself as a key player in the WordPress ecosystem. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.8.1, hosted on AWS infrastructure, and employs modern web technologies such as Typekit fonts, Matomo analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for consent management. The site demonstrates good performance, mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and domain status protections. Cookie consent is managed properly, and no sensitive data exposure or vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no explicit security policy or incident response contacts are published, representing areas for improvement. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations. The domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, publishing a security policy, and implementing a vulnerability disclosure mechanism to further enhance security posture and trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of incsub.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching incsub.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
68
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Incsub holds a strong market position as the operator of multiple prominent WordPress service companies, serving a diverse audience including educational institutions and developers. Its business model revolves around providing hosting, plugins, and security services within the WordPress ecosystem. The company benefits from a well-established brand, consistent messaging, and a partnership ecosystem that includes WPMU DEV, CampusPress, and Edublogs. Growth indicators include a mature domain age and integration of modern analytics and consent tools. The company’s operations reflect a focus on quality, innovation, and compliance, positioning it well for continued success in the WordPress technology sector.

Security posture

The security maturity of Incsub’s website is solid, with HTTPS enforced and domain status protections enabled to prevent unauthorized domain changes. The use of Cookiebot indicates attention to privacy compliance and user consent. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for enhancement. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the site demonstrates good security hygiene but would benefit from formalizing security policies and improving DNS security.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Incsub
Description
We are behind some of the largest and most trusted WordPress products and services on the web, including hosting, performance optimization, Multisite plugins, and security.
Key services
WordPress hosting, Performance optimization, Multisite plugins, Security services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Typekit fonts, Matomo analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot consent management
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
AWS (Amazon Registrar, AWS DNS)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Cookiebot for consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Security status domain flags clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well maintained.
  2. Clear branding and consistent messaging about WordPress-related services.
  3. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and integrated with consent management.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  6. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities in HTML content.
  7. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and business continuity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern WordPress CMS version (6.8.1) with integration of Typekit fonts for typography and Matomo alongside Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. Hosting is inferred to be on AWS infrastructure, supported by the domain registrar and DNS servers. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. The technical implementation reflects a mature and well-maintained infrastructure with opportunities to enhance security configurations and DNS protections.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 72/100Medium25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with incsub.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review incsub.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.