Skip to main content

Security report for incheba.sk

Incheba Expo Bratislava · Real Estate · Slovakia

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Incheba Expo Bratislava operates as a prominent exhibition and event venue in Slovakia, hosting a variety of trade fairs, exhibitions, and events. The website reflects a professional business model focused on event hosting and real estate services related to office spaces. The target audience includes businesses and the general public interested in attending or organizing events. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor, integrating modern tools such as Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy compliance. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and a moderate performance profile. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement, cookie consent mechanisms, and bot protection via reCAPTCHA, though there is room for improvement in publishing explicit security policies and incident response information. Overall, the website is trustworthy, compliant with GDPR, and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching incheba.sk

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
83
Average
55
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a leading position in the Slovak event hosting market, leveraging its physical venue for trade fairs and exhibitions. Its business model revolves around venue rental and event management services, targeting both corporate clients and the public. The website supports this with detailed event listings and contact options. The integration of Google services indicates a focus on data-driven marketing and audience analysis. No direct revenue streams or e-commerce functionalities are evident on the site. The absence of terms of service and security policies suggests potential areas for operational maturity. The company appears to maintain a consistent brand presence and complies with privacy regulations, enhancing its credibility in the market.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and includes security best practices such as cookie consent with granular controls and reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. Security headers are assumed but not explicitly confirmed in the provided data. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in transparency and readiness. Compliance with GDPR is evident through the cookie consent and privacy policy. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened by formalizing policies and improving accessibility compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information, including abuse and security email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet higher standards and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Complete SEO metadata fields such as description and keywords to improve search engine visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Incheba Expo Bratislava
Description
Incheba Expo Bratislava is an exhibition and event center hosting trade fairs, exhibitions, and events primarily in Slovakia. It serves as a venue for various industry and public events.
Key services
Trade fairs, Exhibitions, Event hosting, Office space
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.2, Elementor 3.27.6, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for bot protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress CMS with Elementor builder
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categories
  3. No explicit terms of service page found
  4. Contact information is available via contact page and forms
  5. Use of Google services for analytics and tag management
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  7. No explicit data protection officer contact found
  8. Website content is professional and relevant to event hosting
  9. No adult or questionable content detected
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Elementor for page building, which facilitates flexible content management. Integration with Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot indicates a mature approach to analytics and privacy compliance. The site uses reCAPTCHA for bot protection and lazy loading for images to optimize performance. While the site is mobile optimized and has a good design quality, some SEO metadata fields are empty, suggesting room for improvement. Hosting details are not explicitly available, but the presence of HTTPS and Google services suggests a reliable hosting environment. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with moderate performance and good user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with incheba.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review incheba.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.