Skip to main content

Security report for inado.org

Institute of National Anti-Doping Organisations · Non-profit · Germany

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Institute of National Anti-Doping Organisations (iNADO) is a non-profit international membership organization dedicated to supporting National Anti-Doping Organisations (NADOs) and Regional Anti-Doping Organisations (RADOs). It promotes best practices, fosters community collaboration, and serves as a global voice advocating for clean sport. The website reflects a professional and well-structured platform that provides resources, news, and event information relevant to anti-doping experts and stakeholders. Technically, the website is built on the TYPO3 CMS platform, integrating modern tools such as Google Tag Manager for analytics and Usercentrics for consent management, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with good performance metrics. However, some security headers are missing, and there is no publicly visible security policy or incident response information. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs consent mechanisms for privacy compliance, aligning with GDPR requirements. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical for organizations of this nature, and does not raise immediate concerns. Overall, the site demonstrates a solid security posture but could improve transparency around security policies and incident response. The overall risk assessment is low, with recommendations focusing on enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and adding vulnerability disclosure mechanisms to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching inado.org

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

iNADO occupies a unique position as the largest international community of anti-doping experts and organizations. Its business model centers on membership services, advocacy, and knowledge sharing within the anti-doping sector. The organization benefits from strategic partnerships with key entities such as WADA, enhancing its credibility and influence. Revenue streams likely include membership fees, sponsorships, and event hosting. The target audience includes NADOs, RADOs, sports organizations, and anti-doping professionals globally. Growth indicators include active event scheduling and regular publication of reports and newsletters. The partnership ecosystem is strong, with sponsors and partners committed to clean sport. Strategic observations suggest a focus on expanding community engagement and improving anti-doping practices worldwide.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS encryption and implementation of a consent management platform, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which could hinder rapid response to security events. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file limits transparency for security researchers. Overall, the site shows good baseline security but should enhance its security governance and transparency to align with best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to prevent vulnerabilities from outdated components.
  5. Enhance user trust by providing more detailed information about data protection officers and compliance measures.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Institute of National Anti-Doping Organisations
Description
iNADO is the international member body of National Anti-Doping Organisations (NADOs). It promotes best anti-doping practices, encourages interconnection among NADOs, and serves as their international voice.
Key services
Promoting best anti-doping practices, Facilitating community and collaboration, Advocacy and representation globally, Workshops and events, Resource platforms
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Google Tag Manager, Usercentrics Consent Management
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Usercentrics Consent Management, Mailchimp (inado.us11.list-manage.com)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to anti-doping organizations.
  3. Strong emphasis on community, partnerships, and advocacy in anti-doping.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and implemented with consent management.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected, limiting domain ownership transparency.
  7. Use of modern CMS TYPO3 and integration of Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics.
  8. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected in HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by TYPO3 CMS, a robust and widely used content management system, indicating a stable and scalable infrastructure. Integration of Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics shows adoption of modern analytics and privacy compliance tools. The site is mobile responsive and accessible, with good SEO practices evident from meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in loading times and script management. No hosting provider information was detected from the HTML content. Technical risks are minimal but could arise from missing security headers and reliance on third-party scripts without visible version control or integrity checks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with inado.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inado.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.