Skip to main content

Security report for impocom.com.mx

Impocom · Retail · Mexico

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Impocom is a small Mexican company providing corporate and commercial solutions, primarily through an online store and technical support services. Their offerings include product sales with options for home delivery or in-store pickup, as well as technical support for devices such as desktops, laptops, and printers. The website content is basic and primarily targeted at buyers, sellers, proprietors, and agents within small and micro enterprises. The business model combines e-commerce with service offerings, positioning Impocom as a local provider in the retail and technology sectors. Technically, the website uses older JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.7 and Cufon for font replacement, with no modern CMS or frameworks detected. The site lacks HTTPS, security headers, and modern accessibility or SEO optimizations. Performance is moderate but mobile optimization and accessibility are poor. There is no evidence of analytics or tracking tools, and no structured data or metadata to enhance search engine visibility. From a security perspective, the absence of HTTPS and security headers is a significant concern, exposing users to potential risks. The use of outdated libraries may introduce vulnerabilities. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, indicating poor privacy compliance. Contact information is minimal and unverified, reducing trustworthiness. No incident response or security policy information is available. Overall, the website scores low on security and privacy compliance, with basic content quality and technical implementation. Strategic improvements are needed in security infrastructure, privacy policies, and contact transparency to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching impocom.com.mx

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Impocom operates in the retail and technology sectors, focusing on e-commerce sales and technical support services. Their market positioning appears local or regional, targeting small businesses and individual buyers and sellers. The business model integrates online sales with value-added services such as home delivery and technical support contracts. Revenue streams likely include product sales and service contracts. The company does not display clear partnerships or subsidiaries, and no advanced digital marketing or analytics tools are evident. Growth indicators are limited due to minimal online presence and lack of detailed business information. The partnership ecosystem is not visible from the website content.

Security posture

The current security posture of Impocom's website is weak. The lack of HTTPS is a critical vulnerability, exposing users to data interception risks. No security headers are implemented, and the use of outdated JavaScript libraries increases the attack surface. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response mechanisms. Privacy compliance is poor, with no privacy or cookie policies present. The absence of verified contact information and security policies further reduces the security maturity level. These gaps could lead to reputational damage and regulatory non-compliance if not addressed.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all website traffic.
  2. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Update all JavaScript libraries and dependencies to their latest secure versions.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Provide clear and verified contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Impocom
Description
Impocom is a company offering corporate and commercial solutions, including an online store for purchasing products with options for in-store pickup or home delivery, technical support services for devices like desktops, laptops, and printers, and promotional technical support policies for businesses.
Key services
Online store sales, Home delivery, Technical support for hardware, Promotional technical support policies
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.7, Cufon font replacement, TMS slider plugin, jqTransform plugin
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website lacks HTTPS and security headers.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No verified contact emails or phone numbers present.
  4. Content is primarily in Spanish with some English words.
  5. Use of outdated JavaScript libraries.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. Minimal social media presence or links.
  8. Basic e-commerce and technical support business model.
  9. No structured data or Open Graph metadata present.
  10. No security or incident response information available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website relies on legacy technologies including jQuery 1.7 and Cufon font replacement, which are outdated and may pose security risks. There is no evidence of a modern CMS or responsive design frameworks, resulting in poor mobile optimization and accessibility. The site uses multiple CSS files and JavaScript plugins for UI elements like sliders and form transformations. Performance is moderate but could be improved by modernizing the tech stack and optimizing assets. SEO is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not disclosed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with impocom.com.mx. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review impocom.com.mx.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.