Skip to main content

Security report for imghaste.com

eSolutions Softhouse Limited · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

IMGHaste is a technology company specializing in white-labeled image optimization services designed to improve website speed and reduce server costs. Their service leverages a worldwide CDN with over 550 edge servers and advanced image transformation technologies such as AVIF, WebP, client hints, and service workers. The company targets website owners and developers seeking seamless image optimization without integration complexity. The website demonstrates a good level of technical maturity with modern frameworks and tracking tools, though it lacks some privacy and security policy disclosures. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and service worker usage, but could be improved by adding security headers and formal policies. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable concern that requires further investigation to confirm domain legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching imghaste.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
95
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

IMGHaste operates in the technology sector providing SaaS-based image optimization solutions with a freemium pricing model. Their competitive advantage lies in offering a fully white-labeled service with no URL rewriting and extensive global CDN coverage. The company maintains a blog with technical content to educate and engage its audience. While the business information is clear and professional, the lack of explicit contact details and privacy policies may limit trust for some customers. The company appears small in size and focused on niche market segments such as small businesses and developers. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses service workers to enhance performance and caching, which are positive security practices. However, no explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. The site lacks published privacy, cookie, and incident response policies, which are important for GDPR compliance and user trust. No vulnerability disclosures or security contact channels are provided. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by formalizing policies and adding security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add standard security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and establish a vulnerability disclosure program.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS registration data to ensure domain legitimacy and transparency.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide more detailed business contact information to improve professionalism.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
eSolutions Softhouse Limited
Description
IMGHaste provides a white-labeled image optimization service that improves website speed and reduces server costs without requiring integration. It offers worldwide CDN coverage with 550+ edge servers, automatic image transformations, and client hints support.
Key services
Image optimization, Worldwide CDN delivery, Automatic image transformations, Service worker integration, Performance and SEO enhancement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4.5.2, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Service Workers, Typewriter.js
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of service workers for caching and optimization

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers provided on the main site.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and service workers for image optimization.
  5. Active blog with technical articles supporting business credibility.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS is used.
  7. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual for an active commercial domain.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Bootstrap 4.5.2, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and service workers for advanced image optimization. The site is mobile responsive and performs well with fast loading times. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) describing articles and organization information. However, no CMS was detected, and hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site could benefit from improved accessibility and security header implementation to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with imghaste.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review imghaste.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.