Skip to main content

Security report for imdaad.ae

Imdaad · Real Estate · United Arab Emirates

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Imdaad is a leading integrated facilities management company based in Dubai, UAE, with a strong presence across the Middle East. The company offers a comprehensive range of services including Hard FM, Environmental Services, Material Recovery, Soft FM, Home Maintenance, Fire Detection, and Lift Systems. Imdaad operates through multiple subsidiaries and brands, serving a diverse clientele with a multi-national workforce. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on modern technologies such as Next.js and React, with good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy and cookie policies. WHOIS data confirms legitimacy with consistent registration details and no privacy protection, supporting trustworthiness. Overall, the site is professional, content-rich, and well-branded, targeting business customers in the facilities management sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching imdaad.ae

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
65
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
53
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Imdaad holds a strong market position as a premier facilities management provider in the Middle East, leveraging a multi-cultural workforce and multiple subsidiaries to deliver integrated solutions. Their business model focuses on comprehensive service delivery across Hard FM, Environmental, and Soft FM sectors, supported by sustainability initiatives and certifications. The company targets large enterprises and government entities requiring facility management services. The presence of multiple subsidiaries like Omdaad and Imdaad Misr indicates geographic and sectoral diversification. The website content and structure emphasize trust, quality, and operational excellence, supported by numerous awards and industry memberships. This positions Imdaad as a credible and established player in the facilities management industry.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS ensuring encrypted communications, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder timely reporting and mitigation of security issues. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the analysis. Forms are present but no advanced security mechanisms like CAPTCHA or input validation details are visible. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in headers, policies, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Include incident response contact information and establish a formal security incident management process.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Imdaad
Description
Imdaad is a premier facilities management company in Dubai, delivering smart, integrated solutions across the UAE through a multi-national workforce.
Key services
Hard FM Services, Environmental Services, Material Recovery Facility, Soft FM Services, Home Maintenance Services, Fire Detection and Protection Systems, Lift Systems and Automation
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional corporate site for a large integrated facilities management company in UAE
  2. Content is rich with detailed service descriptions and group information
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on main page or header
  4. Multiple contact points including toll free number and contact forms
  5. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  7. WHOIS data consistent with business claims
  8. No WAF or blocking detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, indicating a contemporary and scalable architecture. The use of Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics shows integration of marketing and analytics tools. Hosting appears to be managed by Etisalat, consistent with the domain registrar and nameservers. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices evident from meta tags and structured navigation. The site uses preloading for fonts and images to improve load times. However, accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless CMS approach. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and performant user experience with opportunities for security and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with imdaad.ae. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review imdaad.ae.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.