Skip to main content

Security report for imaweb.com

Nextlane · Transportation · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nextlane is a European leader in automotive software solutions, providing a comprehensive digital platform that connects car manufacturers and dealerships. Their offerings include Dealer Management Systems, Digital Dealership Solutions, and Digital OEM Solutions, enhanced with AI-driven tools such as LeadHub and Appointment Center. The company targets OEMs and dealerships across multiple European markets, aiming to streamline operations and improve customer experiences. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern marketing and analytics integrations, including HubSpot and Google Tag Manager, and supports multiple languages, indicating a mature digital presence. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though lacks some advanced security headers and explicit security policies. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable concern but does not detract from the professional presentation and business credibility of the site. Overall, the site demonstrates good technical and business maturity with room for improvement in transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048
  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching imaweb.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nextlane operates in the transportation sector, focusing on software solutions for automotive retail and OEMs. Their business model revolves around SaaS offerings that integrate dealership management, CRM, and AI-powered lead management. The company serves a broad European market with over 10,000 dealerships and 60+ OEM brands, positioning itself as a key player in automotive digital transformation. Partnerships with major cloud providers like AWS and a dedicated career portal indicate organizational growth and ecosystem development. Revenue streams likely include software subscriptions and service contracts. The company emphasizes innovation and customer-centric solutions, leveraging AI to enhance operational efficiency and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism, reflecting compliance with basic security and privacy standards. However, no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, and there is no published security policy or incident response information. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, which limits transparency for security researchers. The lack of exposed sensitive data and secure form implementations are positive indicators. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, with opportunities to enhance trust and compliance by publishing security policies and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Add HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information, including a security.txt file, to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide explicit contact details such as company emails and phone numbers to improve user trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nextlane
Description
Leader in Europe, Nextlane develop digital solutions for the automotive industry connecting car manufacturers and dealers’ systems.
Key services
Dealer Management System (DMS), Digital Dealership Solutions (DDS), Digital OEM Solutions (DOS), AI-driven lead management (LeadHub), Appointment Center, CRM and remarketing tools
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot Analytics, CookiePro Consent Management, YouTube embedded video
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of analytics and marketing scripts with consent

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot Ads Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Lemlist
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML; contact via forms only
  3. Strong use of marketing and analytics tools with consent mechanisms
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in provided content
  5. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual for an active commercial website
  6. Website supports multiple languages indicating international presence
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  8. No explicit certifications or security frameworks mentioned
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery and integrations with HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, and LinkedIn Insight for analytics and marketing. The site is multi-lingual and uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO enhancement. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and embedded multimedia content. Mobile optimization is good, though accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The site uses cookie consent management via CookiePro, indicating attention to privacy compliance. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence with room for optimization in accessibility and security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with imaweb.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review imaweb.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.