Skip to main content

Security report for igpandi.org

The International Group of P&I Clubs · Transportation · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The International Group of P&I Clubs operates as a leading mutual insurance consortium providing protection and indemnity coverage for approximately 90% of the world's ocean-going tonnage. The organization offers key services including liability insurance, reinsurance pooling, educational programs, and industry publications, targeting maritime industry professionals and shipping companies globally. The website reflects a strong market position with professional content and consistent branding. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including Bootstrap 5.3, jQuery, D3.js, and integrates analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Web Analytics. The site is hosted behind Cloudflare, ensuring good performance and security. Mobile optimization and SEO practices are well implemented, contributing to a positive user experience. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy or query failure, but the domain appears legitimate and well-maintained. Overall, the website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, security posture, and compliance with privacy regulations, making it a trustworthy resource within the maritime insurance sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching igpandi.org

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The International Group of P&I Clubs holds a dominant position in the maritime insurance market, covering a vast majority of ocean-going vessels. Its business model is based on mutual insurance pooling and reinsurance contracts, providing risk sharing and liability coverage. The organization invests in education and outreach, enhancing industry knowledge and supporting future professionals. Revenue streams likely include member contributions and reinsurance arrangements. The website indicates a mature partnership ecosystem and a strategic approach to market presence, with active communication through news, insights, and social media channels.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent, and use of reputable analytics platforms. However, it lacks some advanced security headers and does not publish a dedicated security policy or incident response contacts, which are best practices for organizations handling sensitive insurance data. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were found. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file suggests room for improvement in transparency and incident readiness. Overall, the security measures are adequate but could be enhanced to align with industry standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to minimize security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
The International Group of P&I Clubs
Description
IGP&I is The International Group of Protection and Indemnity Clubs. Providing liability cover for 90% of the world's ocean going tonnage.
Key services
Protection and Indemnity insurance, Reinsurance pooling, Education and scholarship programs, Publications and industry insights
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.3, jQuery 3.6.0, Popper.js, D3.js 7.8.5, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare Web Analytics, YouTube iframe API, Seersco Cookie Consent
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare analytics
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare Web Analytics, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Web Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
LinkedIn Insight
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to maritime insurance.
  3. No exposed sensitive data or security vulnerabilities detected.
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query failure, likely privacy protection.
  5. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and accessible.
  6. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML; contact via form only.
  7. Social media presence on YouTube and LinkedIn confirmed.
  8. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  9. No security.txt or explicit security policy found.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern and widely supported technology stack including Bootstrap 5.3 for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and D3.js for data visualization. It leverages Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Web Analytics for tracking and performance insights. Hosting appears to be via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. The site uses standard SEO meta tags and includes a cookie consent mechanism. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and implement additional security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with igpandi.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review igpandi.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.