Skip to main content

Security report for igamemedia.com

iGame Media · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

iGame Media operates as a global leader specializing in ultra-low latency sports streaming content tailored for the sports betting industry and applications requiring neutrality between sports rights holders and online operators. The company offers a modular and integrated suite of services including sportsbook streaming platforms, retail digital content solutions, trading of live sports content, and digital rights holder content access. Their market position is strong, supported by a medium-sized operation founded in 2014 with a professional and consistent brand presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and SEO tools, hosted on AWS infrastructure, and demonstrates good mobile optimization and moderate performance. Security posture is solid with enforced HTTPS and domain transfer protections, though improvements are recommended in DNSSEC deployment and security header implementation. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a cookie consent mechanism but lacks a clearly accessible privacy policy and terms of service. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-positioned in its niche, though it would benefit from enhanced security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching igamemedia.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention igamemedia.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for igamemedia.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets B2B clients in the sports betting and sports rights holder sectors, providing end-to-end streaming and content aggregation solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in ultra-low latency streaming capabilities, extensive event coverage, and a scalable global distribution network. Revenue streams likely include service subscriptions and platform integrations. The presence of client testimonials and social media engagement indicates a healthy partnership ecosystem. The business model is focused on delivering tailored solutions either as standalone services or integrated packages, supporting growth and market penetration. Strategic observations suggest continued investment in technology and compliance will enhance market leadership.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate to good, with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents gaps that could expose the site to certain attack vectors. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The cookie consent mechanism aligns with GDPR requirements, but the lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident from the content. Addressing these gaps would improve compliance and reduce risk exposure.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  4. Create and publish a security policy and incident response contact information, including a security.txt file.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
iGame Media
Description
iGameMedia is a global leader in ultra-low latency content for the sports betting industry and neutrality focussed applications between sports rights holders and online operators. They deliver the ultimate user experience to customers and their audiences.
Key services
Sportsbook streaming platform (ONEPlatform), Retail sportsbook digital content solutions, Trading ultra-low latency live sports content, Digital rights holder content access and streaming
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Analytics (MonsterInsights), Revolution Slider, jQuery, Flatpickr, Select2, Responsive Vector Maps, Snazzy Maps
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced via script redirect
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent banner with customization and opt-out

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
MonsterInsights Google Analytics plugin
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with forced redirect
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed categories
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in provided content
  4. Contact available via forms but no direct emails or phone numbers found
  5. Professional design with modern WordPress plugins and SEO optimization
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  7. No security headers detected in HTML content
  8. No DNSSEC enabled for domain
  9. Social media presence on Twitter and LinkedIn confirmed via JSON-LD
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a mature WordPress CMS with popular plugins such as Yoast SEO and MonsterInsights for analytics. Hosting on AWS DNS infrastructure suggests reliable performance and scalability. The use of modern JavaScript libraries and responsive design techniques supports good user experience across devices. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in image loading and script management. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates areas for modernization. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but should evolve to meet higher security and compliance standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with igamemedia.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review igamemedia.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.