Skip to main content

Security report for ifla.org

International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions · Non-profit · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) operates as a globally recognized non-profit organization dedicated to supporting libraries and information professionals worldwide. Their website serves as a comprehensive platform for advocacy, professional development, events, and resources, positioning IFLA as a leading voice in the library sector. The organization targets library associations, institutions, and professionals, offering membership benefits and fostering global collaboration. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and leverages modern web technologies including jQuery, Slick Carousel, Google Tag Manager, and Hotjar for analytics and user experience enhancement. Hosting and CDN services appear to be provided by Cloudflare, ensuring reliable performance and security. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs best practices such as asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. However, there is room for improvement in implementing comprehensive security headers and publishing explicit security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, indicating a solid security posture. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences. The lack of WHOIS data due to privacy protection is typical for organizations of this nature and does not detract from the site's legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy, and improving transparency around incident response.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ifla.org

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
78
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ifla.org, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
29
Employees
0
Customers
29
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
14%

5 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ifla.org.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

IFLA holds a strong market position as the premier international federation for libraries and information services. Its business model is membership-based, focusing on advocacy, professional development, and global networking. Revenue streams likely include membership fees, event sponsorships, and donations. The organization serves a niche but global customer segment comprising library professionals and institutions. Partnerships with related domains and events enhance its ecosystem. Growth indicators include active event calendars and expanding membership statistics. The website's professional content and consistent branding support its credibility and influence in the sector.

Security posture

The security maturity level of the IFLA website is good, with HTTPS enforced and no visible security vulnerabilities. The use of Google Tag Manager and Hotjar is managed with asynchronous loading to minimize performance impact. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security represents a compliance gap. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response contact, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. Data protection practices appear adequate, but formal documentation and transparency could be improved. Overall, the site demonstrates a security-conscious approach suitable for a non-profit organization but should enhance policies and headers to align with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to ensure they comply with privacy and security standards.
  5. Enhance transparency around data retention policies and GDPR compliance to strengthen user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions
Description
IFLA is a global non-profit organization representing library associations, institutions, and professionals worldwide. It focuses on advocating for libraries, promoting sustainable development, professional development, and safeguarding culture and heritage.
Key services
Advocacy for libraries, Professional development and capacity building, Events and conferences, Standards and policy development, Publications and reports
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Slick Carousel, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Cloudflare Insights
Frameworks
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Hotjar with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is rich, well-structured, and professionally presented
  3. Strong focus on library advocacy, professional development, and cultural heritage
  4. Multiple external links to related IFLA domains and partner sites
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  6. No exposed sensitive information or security vulnerabilities detected
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query failure, likely privacy protection in place
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure is based on WordPress CMS, utilizing popular JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Slick Carousel for UI components. Analytics and user behavior tracking are implemented via Google Tag Manager and Hotjar, loaded asynchronously to optimize performance. Hosting and CDN services are provided by Cloudflare, contributing to moderate to good site speed and availability. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility features, indicating attention to user experience. Technical debt appears minimal, but opportunities exist to modernize security headers and improve documentation of privacy and security practices to reduce risk and enhance compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ifla.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ifla.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.